Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

OddBall1st · Jun 12, 2014

Buck,

I`m gonna make the most bomb stuffed shells for dinner tonight so I`ll be checking back in later to read your corrections and citation requests. But first I gotta wash them so I`ll be a bit.

NLXSK1 · Jun 12, 2014

Doer said:
Become an appraiser
And never look back

Home inspector is a good gig but it doesnt pay that great unless you own the business or want to do multiple inspections a day.

Appraisers have had a rough time over the housing crash and moving forward. Lots of special interests wanting to manipulate the data.

Doer · Jun 12, 2014

Why salt?

I've not heard of that

NLXSK1 · Jun 12, 2014

Doer said:
Why salt?

I've not heard of that

He has a chlorine generator which needs salt to operate.

Antidisestablishmentarian · Jun 12, 2014

They are supposed to be better for you and are supposedly cheaper to maintain, but that seems true only in the short term. Apparently they corrode the equipment faster.

Pinworm · Jun 12, 2014

Do you enjoy luxury?

Dr Kynes · Jun 12, 2014

UncleBuck said:
you must be literally retarded, by the way.

i usually don't, but just to amuse myself i actually look at your source.

look at the next graph down, then look back at your graph, and tell me where you think your interpreting kills went to shit.

clearly, as i claimed, china does not even produce twice as much as we do.

india comes nowhere close to us, much less "multiple times".

sadly for you, thumbelinna, is the fact that the numbers you chose to cite (and also misinterpret hilariously) agree exactly with what WIKI!!!MOTHERFUCKING!!!!!!PEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! says.

seriously, just give up.

this report

http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/pbl-2013-trends-in-global-co2-emissions-2013-report-1148.pdf

"For 2012, remarkable trends were seen in the top 3 emitting countries/regions, which accounted for 55% of total global CO2 emissions. Of these three, China (29% share) increased its CO2 emissions by 3%, which is low compared with annual increases of about 10% over the last decade. In the United States (16% share) and the European Union (11% share) CO2 emissions decreased by 4% and 1.6%, respectively."

says china makes just shy of double the us's co2 production, and is increasing while the US is dropping.

and this global warming hysteric site
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/11/2012s-carbon-emissions-in-five-graphs/

says china produced 9.86 gigatonnes of co2
and the us produced 5.19 gigatonnes of co2

considering china's well observed failure to give an accurate report ion anything, +/- 0.4 gigatonnes is a respectable margin for error, so the claim that china produces 2x more co2 than the us is plausible.

since your only rebuttal to evidence so far has been "NU UH!! look at this other graph from the same source that treats the data in a different way, in the same report, that still says china makes ~2x the us's co2/year! PWNED!! WIKIPEDIA ROCKS!"
we can only assume that, as usual you have no way to refute the source and now wish to engage in an exchange of insults so the discussion can be sidetracked.

and then, in maybe 300+ posts youll find an error in THEIR math, but probably not... Yale University's credibility>ASU Dropouts.

Dr Kynes · Jun 12, 2014

Ceepea said:
So, the Chinese are polluting, therefore everyone else shouldn't care about the environment? Nice.

That's not accurate.

Termites do produce CO2 according to M.G. Sanderson, Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge.

Please go to page 2.

Thanks!

No wiki required, just google.com and the phrase "Do termites produce CO2"....

Pretty easy to get an answer.

first, yes, china is polluting, and so is russia, and so is india, etc etc etc.
why are the AGW hysterics focused on forcing the us, and europe to change their ways when the largest "co2 criminals" get ignored? cuz china shoots treehuggers on sight, and putin would lock them up in lubyanka prison for a decade or so of forcible sodomy.

as to the second point, ahem... let me clear my throat...

DUH!

Pada made the "Termites make methane exclusively" claim, based solely on a single retarded "wikihow" answer, despite this half this thread being an argument over exactly how many gigatonnes of co2 termites produce annually (somewhere between 4 gigatonnes and 50 gigatonnes depending on which report you read)

i was scorning his absurd claim, not supporting it.
that would be retarded.

Dr Kynes · Jun 12, 2014

OddBall1st said:
Well Buck,

Since there is between 2 and 3% water vapor in Earths atmosphere at all locations on the average day and 0.04% CO2 I find it difficult to believe that air currents (wind) will concentrate the CO2 to above water vapor levels.

Both CO2 and Water vapor are greenhouse gases that trap longwave radiation inside the atmosphere and the result is air temperatures holding more heat. However since there is 60 times more water vapor in the atmosphere, the airborn CO2 is a less likely factor in holding the heat in the atmosphere. If both water vapor and CO2 were at equal levels in the atmosphere, CO2 would be the greater factor, ...but they are not in equal quantities. But...BUT, CO2 trapped in the oceans is the root cause of the weather heating or cooling the atmosphere.

So while the CO2 is the root cause it is not what holds the heat in the atmosphere. An example would be that cloudy nights are warmer than clear nights because clear nights are cooled by radiational cooling, and hazy, humid days hold more heat because warm air hold more humidity.

Yup, water vapor is the reason the atmosphere holds more heat while CO2 trapped in the ocean water, not the air, is the driving element.

water vapour concentrations range form nearly zero to 6%, with a well accepted global average of 4%
co2 is at 0.035%, not 0.04%

Dr Kynes · Jun 12, 2014

OddBall1st said:
See ?

holy shit.

thats retarded.

i had no idea that co2 was stationary, and lasts for "Hundreds Of Thousands Of Years"

it's amazing what kind of absurd claims bucky can throw out in the midst of his tantrums, which go completely unnoticed.

Harrekin · Jun 12, 2014

Pinworm said:
View attachment 3177969

Do you enjoy luxury?

"Ive a library full of leather bound books and my furniture smells of rich mahogany"

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2014

OddBall1st said:
An example would be that cloudy nights are warmer than clear nights because clear nights are cooled by radiational cooling, and hazy, humid days hold more heat because warm air hold more humidity.

and then a gust of wind blows the clouds away. or it rains.

now if only the millions of years of CO2 we put into the atmosphere over the course of a century would do the same.

:lol:

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2014

Dr Kynes said:
this report

http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/news_docs/pbl-2013-trends-in-global-co2-emissions-2013-report-1148.pdf

"For 2012, remarkable trends were seen in the top 3 emitting countries/regions, which accounted for 55% of total global CO2 emissions. Of these three, China (29% share) increased its CO2 emissions by 3%, which is low compared with annual increases of about 10% over the last decade. In the United States (16% share) and the European Union (11% share) CO2 emissions decreased by 4% and 1.6%, respectively."

says china makes just shy of double the us's co2 production, and is increasing while the US is dropping.

and this global warming hysteric site
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2013/11/2012s-carbon-emissions-in-five-graphs/

says china produced 9.86 gigatonnes of co2
and the us produced 5.19 gigatonnes of co2

considering china's well observed failure to give an accurate report ion anything, +/- 0.4 gigatonnes is a respectable margin for error, so the claim that china produces 2x more co2 than the us is plausible.

since your only rebuttal to evidence so far has been "NU UH!! look at this other graph from the same source that treats the data in a different way, in the same report, that still says china makes ~2x the us's co2/year! PWNED!! WIKIPEDIA ROCKS!"
we can only assume that, as usual you have no way to refute the source and now wish to engage in an exchange of insults so the discussion can be sidetracked.

and then, in maybe 300+ posts youll find an error in THEIR math, but probably not... Yale University's credibility>ASU Dropouts.

that still doesn't say what you need it to say and you clearly fail horribly at reading and interpreting graphs.

NLXSK1 · Jun 12, 2014

UncleBuck said:
and then a gust of wind blows the clouds away. or it rains.

now if only the millions of years of CO2 we put into the atmosphere over the course of a century would do the same.

What do your plants intake??? Bueller??? Bueller??? Bueller???

Doer · Jun 12, 2014

Dr Kynes said:
first, yes, china is polluting, and so is russia, and so is india, etc etc etc.
why are the AGW hysterics focused on forcing the us, and europe to change their ways when the largest "co2 criminals" get ignored? cuz china shoots treehuggers on sight, and putin would lock them up in lubyanka prison for a decade or so of forcible sodomy.

.

I doubt these emerging powerhouses, have an interest in Saving the Ice Age.

Their urban heat bubbles will save them after we have dismantled ours.

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2014

Dr Kynes said:
co2 is at 0.035%, not 0.04%

you're outdated by a few decades, dumbass.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html

we're over 400 PPM now.

should i do the math for you, or do you think you can handle it now?

:lol:

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2014

NLXSK1 said:
What do your plants intake??? Bueller??? Bueller??? Bueller???

you are retarded.

when you take millions of years of sequestered CO2 and release it into the atmosphere over a mere century or two, CO2 goes up quickly, unsurprisingly.

UncleBuck · Jun 12, 2014

i'm still waiting for the two middle aged failures, the pool boy and the stock boy, to show me citation that forest fires cause global cooling.

NLXSK1 · Jun 12, 2014

UncleBuck said:
you are retarded.

when you take millions of years of sequestered CO2 and release it into the atmosphere over a mere century or two, CO2 goes up quickly, unsurprisingly.

Then how do you explain the rise and fall of CO2 before the last thousand years?? Dinosaurs driving SUV's??? You post one graph showing it and then when it suits you jump to a graph that is a mere 1000 years to attempt to prove another point while forgetting the info you already posted.

And you call me stupid??? ROFLMAO!!

NLXSK1 · Jun 12, 2014

UncleBuck said:
i'm still waiting for the two middle aged failures, the pool boy and the stock boy, to show me citation that forest fires cause global cooling.

Yes, cause we all know that you are a failure...

Waiting on other people to make your life better, to teach you, to support you, to take care of you... The ultimate definition of a parasite.

Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member