Scientists grow plants in complete darkness using artificial photosynthesis

PhenoMenal

Well-Known Member
This is quite remarkable!
There's a lot of news articles about it (just google "news artificial photosynthesis"), but for example see:

Summary:
Photosynthesis has evolved in plants for millions of years to turn water, carbon dioxide, and the energy from sunlight into plant biomass and the foods we eat. This process, however, is very inefficient, with only about 1% of the energy found in sunlight ending up in the plant. Scientists at UC Riverside and the University of Delaware have found a way to bypass the need for biological photosynthesis altogether and create food independent of sunlight by using artificial photosynthesis.

The research, published in Nature Food, uses a two-step electrocatalytic process to convert carbon dioxide, electricity, and water into acetate, the form of the main component of vinegar. Food-producing organisms then consume acetate in the dark to grow.

Combined with solar panels to generate the electricity to power the electrocatalysis, this hybrid organic-inorganic system could increase the conversion efficiency of sunlight into food, up to 18 times more efficient for some foods.
Needless to say my first thought was how this can help the cannabis community lol :)
And I wonder if it's more affordable? seeing as lighting/electricity is the most expensive part of indoor growing.
There's also a Wikipedia page for artificial photosynthesis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_photosynthesis
 
Last edited:

Budzbuddha

Well-Known Member
They used “ solar panels “ to power a conversion process - so technically it’s just a bypass in plant functions .

Hard to replace the simplicity of actual sunlight ( which BTW has spectral ranges that human eyes cannot detect ) that complete the entire spectrum that plants may use. Sure there are plant species that can grow in complete darkness , caves or what not.

Too easy to , run an outdoor plant without the expense or logistical re-think for an indoor setup.
‘No artificial gimmicks needed.
 

Boatguy

Well-Known Member
This is quite remarkable!
There's a lot of news articles about it (just google "news artificial photosynthesis"), but for example see:

Summary:

Needless to say my first thought was how this can help the cannabis community lol :)
And I wonder if it's more affordable? seeing as lighting/electricity is the most expensive part of indoor growing.
There's also a Wikipedia page for artificial photosynthesis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_photosynthesis
Mushrooms,algae, and yeast are not cannabis... Pretty cool though
 

Coldnasty

Well-Known Member
This is quite remarkable!
There's a lot of news articles about it (just google "news artificial photosynthesis"), but for example see:

Summary:

Needless to say my first thought was how this can help the cannabis community lol :)
And I wonder if it's more affordable? seeing as lighting/electricity is the most expensive part of indoor growing.
There's also a Wikipedia page for artificial photosynthesis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_photosynthesis
Summary: Scientists mess up yet more shit.
 

DrDukePHD

Well-Known Member
Imagine the bravado of these scientists to claim billions of years of plant evolution created an inefficient sunlight/energy conversion system.

Still, this tech might be useful if the sky is ever blacked out with ash. Assuming the solar panels can be replaced with nuclear reactors.
 
Top