@GrumpyToker - as I mentioned my 600W has a switch on the ballast for 50%, 75%, and 100%. My intention was to buy a 400W for this tent when I started, but the 600 was maybe $10 more and can be dimmed, so I bought that with future grows in mind. I never have it above 75% (~450W).
To everyone else, I got the problem solved with your suggestions! It was running 9F above ambient on the 50% (~300W) setting, with my vortex on full blast. It's now running 4F above ambient on that setting, with the vortex at 2/3 power, which means I can turn the light back up to 75% again and not have an issue.
What I did was:
6" carbon filter -> short length of duct -> cool tube -> short length of duct -> vortex -> short length of duct -> window
I then took my 240CFM booster and hooked it up with a 6" to 4" coupler onto the 4" carbon filter. This is my backup carbon filtration for when lights are out, and runs 24/7. It does provide negative pressure, but not nearly as much as having the vortex hooked up like this now does.
I now have the added benefit of never leaking any cool tube air back into the grow chamber from any small leaks in the ducting, as it's sucking until it gets outside the tent.
So, what have I learned?
#1, that I'm sorry to
@Resinhound for not trusting his advice sooner
#2, that I still have no actual proof that the fan runs more efficiently when sucking (I now believe that it does, but this experiment didn't prove that definitively as I changed other variables), BUT that using the vortex for both the cool tube and the grow chamber air is definitely far more efficient than using a sealed cool-tube run that contains no tent air, and a separate fan/filter for the tent air. This is really the main thing that changed, having the vortex work hot air out of the top of the tent AND the cool tube, as opposed to just the cool tube with a separate fan for the hot air at the top of the tent
#3, carbon filter drag is far less of a match for the vortex than it was for the 240CFM booster.
Downsides to the new setup:
#1 I think I'm going to go through carbon filters much faster, as well as filter covers.
#2 My humidifiers will be running much more often to keep it at 40% RH in there. This also means more mineral buildup on the carbon filters.
Upsides:
#1 and most importantly, the plants are happy
#2 I was able to remove the tiny 100CFM booster from my setup, and am still able to use both carbon filters.
#3 I can use my light on 75% (~450W) again, whoohoo!
#4 More air being carbon filtered means a safer grow (smell-wise)
Moral of the story is if you only have one big inline fan, use it for everything, not just one thing. If you have more than one, than you can probably have the separate cool-tube run and grow chamber air exhaust as I was using before. Thanks again to everyone that helped out!