Farmer.J
Well-Known Member
Yet you justify armanian genocide as "every right to practice their religion"
Sessions is a repressive conservative, but he's got balls
- Thread starter Roger A. Shrubber
- Start date
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
i duuno, trumps been up his ass since very shortly after appointing him. i'm pretty sure trump expected him to basically stop the meuller investigation, or at least derail it, and he refused to do it. refused to have anything to do with it.
like i said, i don't like his politics, but i think he's an ethical elf
Roger A. Shrubber
Well-Known Member
i never said he was a friend, or that i even like him. it's possible you and captain morgan are both right, and he is just distancing himself....but it's still pissing trump off, and that's always entertaining, if nothing else.
Farmer.J
Well-Known Member
Liberals are modern day "nice" Nazi's. Nazi's would criminalize people for religious beliefs, much like liberals mock anything that isn't "liberal".
Linguistically its an oxymoron. There are some people who identify as liberals, but are in fact authoritarian socialists, but that’s just a case of moniker abuse, it doesn’t change the meaning of “liberal” or “Nazi”.
There are an increasing number of people who seem to believe that people should be free to identify as anything they like - so long as they are functionally liberal. This paradox might be most visible in the case of people who are massively sensitive to any criticism of Islam, and declare that it should be at all times respected, yet simultaneously maintain that commonly held Islamic beliefs about women’s rights and homosexuality are indefensible [1,2].
In other words, they believe that its cool to be a Muslim just so long as you don’t strongly believe those things most Muslims hold to be true. which conflict with liberalism. The confusion isn’t restricted to Islam, it seems to extend to any belief system that doesn’t perfectly align with “progressive thought”.
This form of “compulsory liberalism” clearly isn’t liberal, but it isn’t necessarily socialist or progressive either. There should be a word it (other than “idiocy”), but “liberal-Nazi” isn’t it. “Politically correct” used to be a helpful catchall, but the term has become so abused in recent years, it has become almost worthless.
Linguistically its an oxymoron. There are some people who identify as liberals, but are in fact authoritarian socialists, but that’s just a case of moniker abuse, it doesn’t change the meaning of “liberal” or “Nazi”.
There are an increasing number of people who seem to believe that people should be free to identify as anything they like - so long as they are functionally liberal. This paradox might be most visible in the case of people who are massively sensitive to any criticism of Islam, and declare that it should be at all times respected, yet simultaneously maintain that commonly held Islamic beliefs about women’s rights and homosexuality are indefensible [1,2].
In other words, they believe that its cool to be a Muslim just so long as you don’t strongly believe those things most Muslims hold to be true. which conflict with liberalism. The confusion isn’t restricted to Islam, it seems to extend to any belief system that doesn’t perfectly align with “progressive thought”.
This form of “compulsory liberalism” clearly isn’t liberal, but it isn’t necessarily socialist or progressive either. There should be a word it (other than “idiocy”), but “liberal-Nazi” isn’t it. “Politically correct” used to be a helpful catchall, but the term has become so abused in recent years, it has become almost worthless.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I am glad that the Trump administration is collapsing in on itself instead of projecting it's harmful policies at this time. Sessions is scum and I hope his line ends with him.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Your beliefs are irrelevant, wrong and reflect badly upon you.
Buddha2525
Well-Known Member
I'm willing to say the system ain't fair and give you reality deniers 42.75%. Instead keep up but Shillary the best hope for America "won"! Hint, she didn't. Sad!
MichiganSpinDoctor
Well-Known Member
I don't. Why do you ask?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
You support racist ideology and voted for Trump, so you most clearly do. I suppose you are going to say you aren't racist either, LOL.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
She should have spit instead of swallowed.
MichiganSpinDoctor
Well-Known Member
Your prejudice is pretty overwhelming. What racist ideology have I ever supported? If I remember right, it's none.
travisw
Well-Known Member
He doesn't possess the faculties to articulate his own beliefs.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-definition-of-a-liberal-Nazi
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
I spoke factually.
Trump is a racist. You said you voted for Trump. By the transitive property, you voted for a racist. Do you no longer support Trump because of his racism?
I quite resonably concluded you still support Trump due to your post below:
There are several actions taken by Trump that would disappoint somebody who isn't racist. It is reasonable to conclude that you are racist.
Farmer.J
Well-Known Member
You support armanian genocide and voted for the butcher of Benghazi. I suppose you are going to say that you aren't a liberal Nazi either, LOL.
Herb & Suds
Well-Known Member
"Butcher of Benghazi" ?Kill yourself you are the deep state
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Nope to the first point.
To your second point, there is no such thing as a liberal Nazi. Read the link in travis's post. Several respondents in that link say you are an idiot.
Farmer.J
Well-Known Member
That's exactly what a liberal Nazi would say
MichiganSpinDoctor
Well-Known Member
I dont see any hate coming from trump. I see a lot of hate and anger directed at him. What should have disappointed me?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Exactly. You can't see the racism in Trump's policies, tweets or stump speeches. Only a racist can say that.
Is this where you completely capitulate by asking me what racism is embodied in Trump's speeches?