shady's blue rhino main-line (attempt #2)

shadyslater

shadyslater

Well-Known Member
research and the right folks here
plus i love this shit man lol

i know this run iv ran some top notch shizzle... its taken a while and and its pissed me off but man this its only gonna get better from my samples iv had and it killer
 
weediologist

weediologist

Well-Known Member
f'ing awesome....are u going to put her in 72hr darkness then cut? i have read ur journal but cant remember but u veg for 2 months right?
 
shadyslater

shadyslater

Well-Known Member
yh mate 60 day veg.

i put her into 10days of darkness but i aint get nowhere to put her lol (that i trust and is vented)
 
papapayne

papapayne

Well-Known Member
wow ten full days of darkness? What is your reasoning behind that? I have done the 72 hours of darkness, but didn't really notice any differences when i did.
 
weediologist

weediologist

Well-Known Member
in more then 48hrs of darkness the plant thinks it dying and needs to get pollinated....and produces more trichromes to help the plant catch pollen.... thats my guess and that makes sense to me y a plant gets 20% more trichomes during that long dark time.
 
papapayne

papapayne

Well-Known Member
Yea that's the theory behind leaving them in darkness for 72 hours, I have tried it with several strains...didn't see any difference in the quality of the weed.
 
shadyslater

shadyslater

Well-Known Member
I read a post by the editer of skunk magazine dayin 10 is the only way to really see a difference in trich production
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top