Stop being cunty kid. I never said or even inferred that all I smoke is landrace strains, though if I could get my hands on about six or eight of them that would be all I would ever smoke again.
What I do mainly smoke, and greatly prefer, are strains that are 100% sativa. They are sativa crosses but still true sativas nonetheless and not crosses with indica. I am a purest when it comes to cannabis and I laugh at those who see anything that is even just slightly more than 50% indica being called by then an indica by them and anything that is even just slightly more than 50% sativa being called a sativa by them. It is as if they believe the words cross or hybrid have become meaningless and every thing is either indica or sativa.
K brick ball Headband is like the only kush I don't like it was weak. It's as flawed as the cannabis cup so don't go throwin around that shit as credentials. And your whole argument proved nothing but how it was in the old days. You can't say there isn't kush out there that isn't intensely fucking strong or maybe I need to hook you up. All the kush I smoke is energetic tasty sugar in a blunt the history of pure cannabis species and subspecies, and after mentioning a subspecies, rasta, that some researchers accept as a separate subspecies and that some do not. Rasta is just like Ruderalis in that some researchers do not accept ruderalis as a genus cannabis subspecies and instead categorize it with hemp in that it is practically devoid of THC and its only real use has been for fiber. Still among the oh so learned and experienced cannabis experts on RIU Ruderalis is most definitely a genuine subspecies, regardless of some expert researchers not agreeing with many RIU'ers. People here like to decide for themselves what things are and what reality is, too them anyway, and totally reject what expert researchers may or may not believe or agree on.
I was talking about landrace strains, pure strains, and not just any cross that some little clown shoe pollen chucker decided to add Kush to the name of to sucker in the Beavis & Butthead types and increase sales.
Maybe you just totally misunderstood what I had been writing about, something not all that uncommon among many people here once I begin to get technical, but the reply about some Kush strains being mostly sativa was about as opposite from what I was writing about as is humanly possible to achieve.
The statement of some Kush crosses being mostly sativa goes to show how typical marketing practices have taken over the naming and marketing of strains. There was a time, for many years in fact, when if something was named a Kush it was a cross of all Kush strains or at most has a very small percentage of some sativa in it, like possibly as much as up to 10%. The same went with Haze strains. If you saw Haze in a name it was all sativa or almost all sativa, and the sativa strains in it had to be certain sativas used, real "Haze strains" for to be called and considered to be a Haze.
Now it is largely a case of just naming something in a way that will best catch the suckers eye and capture the suckers attention and then get the suckers money.
Today someone could make a triple cross of two sativas and one Kush strain, where the Kush strain made up a very small percentage of the cross and they would call it a Kush and the puppies of today would instantly get wood over it because it would be called a Kush and when the sativa potency sent them to the moon they would say that's the Kush influence in it that causes that because they wrongly believe that Kush is another spelling for potency and quality.
The old dogs know better.
Its long been known, that is among anyone who actually knows about cannabis, that landrace Kush strains, and landrace indicas in general, are higher in CBD and CBN but also most are lower in THC levels, and in some cases much lower, in THC, than landrace sativa strains and that landrace sativa strains are lower in CBD AND CBN and higher in THC, and in some, mainly African Asian and Equatorial sativas there is not only THC but also THCV, something not found in any landrace indica, landrace Kush or otherwise.
Even among the few landrace indicas, landrace Kushs included, that did have fairly high percentages of THC the percentages of CBD and CNB toned down the affects of the higher THC and they do not produce the same kind of mind warping high that landrace sativas will.
Look through the list of Cup winners, even just Indica Cup winners and you will find very few strains with the name Kush attached to them. They are not the cat's pajamas like so many puppies of today wrongly believe they are.
Check out the genetics of one of the few winners with Kush in it's name, 3rd place, 2009. Notice all the sativa in it? Without it Headband aka "Sour Kush" would never have won
Reserva Privada - Headband .. "Aka: Sour Kush ... Headband Kush ...."
