CrackerJax
New Member
Atheism is self evident.
G*D is not.
G*D is not.
The Jew G*D is Not. CorrectAtheism is self evident.
G*D is not.
"I AM your God" - EvidenceNo G*D of any sort is in evidence.
,Remember, it's better to click the "neg rep" button than it is to use your brain for things like rational thought!
https://www.rollitup.org/newbie-central/201828-2-week-old-plants-few.htmlPadawanBater is a troll
All he dose is bait the political forums with leftist propaganda
Sheckout these posts and decide for yourself if he's here to help growers, or grow anything
He's gonna tell you you'd have turned out to be a better person if they had prayer in school.
And then blame the holocaust on Atheism.
There. I saved him some typing.
"I AM your God" - Evidence
but, back to the point - A to B
So, Atheism is Absolute in Practice and Truth because no probable God/gods/higher being/ collective being exists. That is what you are posing by your statement. Atheism is Absolute above all other practices in truth because the aforementioned is absolute?
Another question if you don't mind. Is the Universe Immortal? or, was it brought into being/existence?, thus concluding to an imminent death of non being/non-existence? Anyone may answer, but I know you may have an enlightening opinion on this as well, you have been absolute in your calculations so far as suggested above, I believe.., but I'm waiting on further analysis regarding your reply.
Can we get back on topic, and stop with the personal attacks. I simply stated myself to being your God., I did not say you had to worship me. Now you are implying me to be a dog. , How Rude!!Look at the convoluted mental gymnastics.... jump through the hoop boy! Ooops...you missed...try again.
The scientific method as we know it today was not used in those days. Scientists used whatever techniques they thought were accurate, there wasn't a testable, verifiable way to corroborate data during that time. Today there is. That's why using such claims like the one Mrs. Wright made is ignorant. It was the scientists who came along and corrected the mistake. Like Morgen said, she's just parrotting shit she's heard from other creationists without actually doing any research, then to top it off, during her presentation she carries the smuggest smile I've ever witnessed! I LOL'd when Dawkins said "just pick up a book!" lmfao!Are all things considered Victorian era permissable to the fault of thought, because present accurate knowledge and thought has been formed and calculated?
And if so, Are these permissable faults only allowed to specific era and to the allegiance of science, only?
And, Are permissable faults part of an natural order of acquiring information, that leads to further investigation that produces the accurate information, however being, the faulty information was seemingly correct, but misinterpreted?
And if So, Isn't it possible that only the creationist believers are only capable of correcting the faults and misinterpretations of faulty knowledge and thought?
Or, Is the faulty Knowledge and Thought held by creationist, besieged to interpretation by scientists only as well?
Also, one of my favorite parts of those vids was how he continued to so dispel the horrendous philosohy of Dowinism, and how he would hate to see Dowinism acted upon as a philosophical element of society..
Are all things considered Victorian era permissable to the fault of thought, because present accurate knowledge and thought has been formed and calculated?
And if so, Are these permissable faults only allowed to specific era and to the allegiance of science, only?
And, Are permissable faults part of an natural order of acquiring information, that leads to further investigation that produces the accurate information, however being, the faulty information was seemingly correct, but misinterpreted?
And if So, Isn't it possible that only the creationist believers are only capable of correcting the faults and misinterpretations of faulty knowledge and thought?
Or, Is the faulty Knowledge and Thought held by creationist, besieged to interpretation by scientists only as well?
Also, one of my favorite parts of those vids was how he continued to so dispel the horrendous philosohy of Dowinism, and how he would hate to see Dowinism acted upon as a philosophical element of society..
Could you please answer the questions kind Sir, I have a crutch and find it difficult to jump through hoops, so could you please correct my limp so that I don't continue to fail, repeatedly. I heard you won gold at the Special Mental Olympics, So I would appreciate your help in answering a poor cripples questions.Look at the convoluted mental gymnastics.... jump through the hoop boy! Ooops...you missed...try again.