iHearAll
Well-Known Member
what is? God is the authors? no shit.it's the authors brother
what is? God is the authors? no shit.it's the authors brother
Sure I can see where you come from, it has the ability to have different meanings hence the Catholic church difers from Protestant movements due to corruption and translation differences, both human flaws.it was in reference to the bible not being written by god and therefore can be wrong. It would be like saying I want to debate you on man made global warming, but both sides can only use David Suzuki quotes.
I can qoute NT verses post supposed life of Jesus that reinforces slavery. The thing is these verses are considered pseudographical Pauline letters. What Paul says in the Epistles that most scholars consider authentic is this one verse:Ah but this was way before Christ. Around 1440 years before....
I know I quoted a book that was around the same time, it was a quick look up to try justify my point but made me realise.
Anyone that follows a book written 1440 years before Christ cannot really follow what Christ himself said. As Love your neighbour and forgive all debts cannot fit the old testament. There for these people are probably not Christian as such...
it's the authors thats brianwashed thouwhat is? God is the authors? no shit.
that's my view, but what would i know, i only said you sound branwashed and i can't help what i hear whether it's right or wrong.yes duh. the authors wrote it that way. i wouldnt look at a blue wall and call it spaghetti
fuck brother stop the fuck crying man, seriously.im not sure this retard even grows. what a douche.
I don't think I could do that, sounds gnarly. I like other ppl to kill my food, but I'll grow some food in the veggie garden.you ever kill your own food kid? bleed out 20 chickens in a row and save their blood for compost?
grr !!you ever kill your own food kid? bleed out 20 chickens in a row and save their blood for compost?
then its a white speghetti monster on a blue background... right? is this a cognitive test? i mean shit that's how I read these books. if everyone has there own idea of God then we are to respect them for their beliefs right? if god is a fictional and sarcastic speghetti monster then we are to assume the person understands there is no manifestation of God. but maybe misses that they themself are still speaking about the force that controls everything, including the force in their mind that says "hey, me, God's not out there in the world other than what we make of it". i mean, they aren't suggesting the force in control of everything IS the speghetti monster but are displaying that they are free from picking a side on naming God or even really caring what God does. because really it doesnt matter. i only ever chose to learn about what these people consider to be God when i started traveling the world. i realized i dont speak their language but the people i wanted to communicate with were the people promoting goodness. ill always suggest staying away from the snake religion salesmen because they clearly are after something from you. money, your soul, idk maybe some game being played in their head like the people holding signs saying the end is near and to repent. that's just silly. give us an explanation.What if it was a flying spaghetti monster on a blue background up against a blue gridded wall ? What then?
View attachment 3769098
I'm not sure where that is stating that slavery is fine. We are of course discussing a book that has been up for debate for thousands of years and sadly has led to people causing harm to one a other despite the message of the new testament advising against. So I do see how people have come to different conclusions but reinforces?I can qoute NT verses post supposed life of Jesus that reinforces slavery. The thing is these verses are considered pseudographical Pauline letters. What Paul says in the Epistles that most scholars consider authentic is this one verse:
1 Corinthians 7:19-24Revised Standard Version (RSV)
"19 For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God. 20 Every one should remain in the state in which he was called. 21 Were you a slave when called? Never mind. But if you can gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity.22 For he who was called in the Lord as a slave is a freedman of the Lord. Likewise he who was free when called is a slave of Christ. 23 You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men. 24 So, brethren, in whatever state each was called, there let him remain with God."
no i don't follow sir, i'm too stoned to understand anything atm ...... but wait what ! ?then its a white speghetti monster on a blue background... right? is this a cognitive test? i mean shit that's how I read these books. if everyone has there own idea of God then we are to respect them for their beliefs right? if god is a fictional and sarcastic speghetti monster then we are to assume the person understands there is no manifestation of God. but maybe misses that they themself are still speaking about the force that controls everything, including the force in their mind that says "hey, me, God's not out there in the world other than what we make of it". i mean, they aren't suggesting the force in control of everything IS the speghetti monster but are displaying that they are free from picking a side on naming God or even really caring what God does. because really it doesnt matter. i only ever chose to learn about what these people consider to be God when i started traveling the world. i realized i dont speak their language but the people i wanted to communicate with were the people promoting goodness. ill always suggest staying away from the snake religion salesmen because they clearly are after something from you. money, your soul, idk maybe some game being played in their head like the people holding signs saying the end is near and to repent. that's just silly. give us an explanation.
@primabudda i think we got here because i can safely tie morallity to many teachings from really old texts. history is real so the people that believed in moral code were real. they wanted to share moral code so they wrote fictional but entertaining books including their idea of God. of course when you add God into a book it gets real complicated for the masses and politics throws away the morality. you could write your own books if you wanted. your creativity will exhibit what you believe a God should do versus what they would do. not that the God you just made up is sitting up in space in reality, some people may believe that you believe that but you would know otherwise. follow?
Yeah but if God is an egg....what laid it?......no i don't follow sir, i'm too stoned to understand anything atm ...... but wait what ! ?
i could write a book on life as i think it happened, and say god is an egg ? i could do that ?