NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Pada is not talking about labor, he is talking about stealing money from one group and giving it to another. No labor is involved.Labor creates all wealth.
Pada is not talking about labor, he is talking about stealing money from one group and giving it to another. No labor is involved.Labor creates all wealth.
Sounds like capitalism.Pada is not talking about labor, he is talking about stealing money from one group and giving it to another. No labor is involved.
Yes because capitalism is all about government taxation... Oh wait... It's not. No wonder you think I am confused, you have it 180.Sounds like capitalism.
Actually capitalism can not exist with out gov't to enforce privatization.Yes because capitalism is all about government taxation... Oh wait... It's not. No wonder you think I am confused, you have it 180.
Which has nothing to do with taxation and redistribution of wealth. Nice try at sidelining the thread twice with irrelevant comments!!!Actually capitalism can not exist with out gov't to enforce privatization.
Privatization has everything to do with capitalism, dumb ass.Which has nothing to do with taxation and redistribution of wealth. Nice try at sidelining the thread twice with irrelevant comments!!!
Putting money in savings, stocks, and retirement is a positive for the economy.If millionaires spent their money, they wouldn't be millionaires very long, would they?
Silly poor people.
150k vs 150k.i don't recall him pretending to be a woman though.
so?
how many jobs are supported by a rich person buying a $150k car, whereas how many jobs and businesses are supported by 5 people making $30k a year and spreading it throughout all parts of the economy?
do you even think about the shit you say first?
Putting money into savings is not positive for the economy. It doesnt not stimulate the economy at all. Retirement only benefits the economy of you're putting it into funds where it can benefit more than just you, i.e. Ssi. Stocks is positive for the economy because you are putting money you have saved back into the economy.Putting money in savings, stocks, and retirement is a positive for the economy.
When people put money into savings it gives banks the capital to make loans. Saving is positive for the economy and for the individual citizen.Putting money into savings is not positive for the economy. It doesnt not stimulate the economy at all. Retirement only benefits the economy of you're putting it into funds where it can benefit more than just you, i.e. Ssi. Stocks is positive for the economy because you are putting money you have saved back into the economy.
Holding onto money is, more or less, negative for the economy.
loans are debt though, and you can't stop talking about how bad debt is. what gives?When people put money into savings it gives banks the capital to make loans. Saving is positive for the economy and for the individual citizen.
I was a man the first year I was on here.I enjoy pretending to be a woman. Sounds like your bigotry opposes my lifestyle.
I'm a well known idiot and here you are, once again, trying to reason with me. What does that say about you?
Strike 2.
You get one more chance.
Speaking of California,I was a man the first year I was on here.
not very believable...I have a finance degree and I worked in the field for a while and got into sales in 2009
We can agree on this. Out of all the crap taught at our public schools ^^^^this should be a main course.It's as easy as it is wrong to laugh at those without basic financial skills. The truth is that it damages us all, because financially and economically illiterate people still work, vote and make decisions that affect the finances of many or all the rest of us.
We need to find some way to bridge these gaps between different groups of people. If we continue to separate ourselves by education, status, class, nevermind ethnicuty, religion or skin color, we will never be able to come together to demand that those who own all the chips be finally called to account.
A decent financial education is absolutely not something to take for granted or assume others can easily grasp. On the other hand, it's a lot more complicated than it really needs to be- the better to hide the loopholes, of course.
Sounds like shitty planning.Ps, I can afford the downpayment on the house regardless with taxes, I just would prefer not to pay 35-40% of what I sell to the govt. I'd rather move out of the state for 2 years and avoid the income tax on it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When you apply for a house loan they tell you how much house you can afford.
if you can't figure out on your own how much you can afford i.e. house, car, steak dinner, you need to rethink your planSounds like shitty planning.
Having savings and investments reduces the need for federal aid programs.Putting money into savings is not positive for the economy. It doesnt not stimulate the economy at all. Retirement only benefits the economy of you're putting it into funds where it can benefit more than just you, i.e. Ssi. Stocks is positive for the economy because you are putting money you have saved back into the economy.
Holding onto money is, more or less, negative for the economy.