shannonball
Well-Known Member
Not sure if anyone has seen this new setup but its pretty freaking incredible for serious growers.
check it out here: http://www.lifelightsystems.com
check it out here: http://www.lifelightsystems.com
Thats all fine and dandy. You might increase potency and yield significantly using 3 different types of bulbs, but there is absolutely no way that the increased cost of having 3 bulbs operating over the same area is going to be more efficient in terms of grams per watt per dollar. You're going to get more bud, sure, but you're also going to spend 3x more on your energy bills. 3000w on a 5x5 area as opposed to having 1000w covering a significantly larger spacial footprint is going to increase your yield with only marginal increases to your operating costs, and getting the lights closer to your plants is accomplished just the same with a light mover as it is with this spinner technology.From my expierence of using mh hps and uvb all at once in flowering you cant beat all spectrums quality goes through the fucken roof. And with getten the lights so close to your plants yeild sky rockets man your lightmover has nothing on the spinner read posts of people who own them you wont hear a single bad word about them.r
Realistically this tech is only applicable in small growing operations. If you're confined to a small grow where you have to eek out every bit of growth you can in a confined location then by all means adapting this technology will improve your yields since you're unable to adapt light movers into small grows. However, the real use of this technology would be much better applied to LED lighting. HIDs have a fairly high light penetration ability especially when higher wattage lights are used but LEDs severely lack in canopy penetration in comparison and also generally have a smaller area which the light is reaching. Spinning 2 or more different LEDs over the same small location would definitely increase your yields significantly without increasing your operating costs too greatly. The only added costs would obviously be the higher upstart cost, which I believe would be more than justifiable in this situation as a long term investment.i think you guys both make good points. you should email the owner at the site and ask him these questions. All i know is that the commercial growers are using his product big time in their operations. Both in the US and Canada. So i'm guessing they know what they're doing versus us folks growing in a tent, shed or computer case. jus sayin...