That wasn't how the two witnesses I heard said it.
They can lawfully order you to disperse or leave an area. I f you fail to comply, they can arrest you for it. A declaration of martial law is not necessary.
what witnesses do you have? i have the interview from a kid that was with him and a lady that lives in the apt facing the scene. oh and she recorded it and the police took her phone. welcome to the police state you always wanted.
so you agree the police can trample the 1st amendment. I always interpreted the first amendment that people were able to assemble in this country. im pretty sure it says we have the right to assemble. No?
I agree
This is the most serious I have ever seen you. I guess this subject has really hit home for you. I must say you have made me proud of you.
One of them was the deceased's friend who was walking with him when it all went down. The other was a lady who just happened to be there. Neither said anything about him getting hit with a door.
Where did I say anything like that? I just stated what the law is.
There's video of them throwing Molotov cocktails.They clearly brought them with them whether the tear gas or the cocktails flew first. There clearly is justification for peaceful protests, but there seem to be elements among the protesters that want to escalate the situation into riot. Many credit MLK's peaceful marches with the great advances in civil rights in the 60's, but I don't think they would have been as effective if there hadn't been violent riots occurring at the same time that forced the powers that be to pay attention to the situation. Sometimes you need to smack people with a 2x4 to get them to pay attention.
