STL is about to start rioting.

Antidisestablishmentarian

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
Actually it's 12 million... 6million jews and 6million of anyone else they didn't like... Jews conflate their number to garner more sympathy and justify ongoing israeli war crimes nothing more...

That's the whole quote. I don't see holocaust denial. I see him saying that 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust.

His opinion on inflating numbers doesn't equal denial of the holocaust.
 
ASMALLVOICE

ASMALLVOICE

Well-Known Member
You have to remember bucky only sees what his narrow minded, look through a keyhole with both eyes ass wants too, anything else is just that, anything else. His bean size mind is made up, facts mean nothing to him...lol

Peace

Asmallvoice
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Antidisestablishmentarian said:
Actually it's 12 million... 6million jews and 6million of anyone else they didn't like... Jews conflate their number to garner more sympathy and justify ongoing israeli war crimes nothing more...

That's the whole quote. I don't see holocaust denial. I see him saying that 6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust.

His opinion on inflating numbers doesn't equal denial of the holocaust.
Click to expand...
yep, and that historically agreed upon number is conflated to garner sympathy and justify war crimes, according to sketchy etchy.

totally doesn't match the definition of holocaust denial at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

Most Holocaust denial claims imply, or openly state, that the Holocaust is a hoax arising out of a deliberate Jewish conspiracy to advance the interest of Jews at the expense of other peoples.
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
aren't you a holocaust denier?
Click to expand...
I'm not no. Back to your ducks, I was wondering because ducks gang rape to procreate. Did you know that?

Ah c'mon you'd know that with all the continual comments you make regarding rape.

It's no coincidence a rapist has rapist ducks...



No wonder you like ducks... Goes hand in hand with your "cause"...

AMIRITE?:lol:

BTW didn't you recently move from Oregon? What did you do to those ducks?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Meowlistenhere said:
Holy shit, yea that's messed up to say the least. I guess he was all set for college. No criminal record, just a good kid with a promising future. So many cops that are completely out of control offing innocent people left and right. Becoming militarized. Cant even go for a drive through some states without showing your papers and getting grilled and harassed. Lots of video out there (endless) showing cops just completely out of control. And then they are rewarded for it! Ten minutes of youtube watching police brutality and the blood begins to boil. And its only increasing. These cops are being trained to do this shit and that its okay and the right thing to do!! They get commended for it! Patted on the back, called a hero because evidently shooting unarmed people is now just following procedure. Who polices the police anymore? They have been handed a free pass to basically do whatever they see fit, without consequences. Paid leave at the very most. Kelly Thomas is another great example, out of seemingly thousands.
Click to expand...
He was dues to start trial in Sept. which means he probably wasn't going to start college. He also just robbed a store 15 minutes before his death. You don't have a clue.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Darren Wilson was let go from a police department in Jennings that historically had issues of racial tension, mismanagement and turmoil. The truth is starting to come out. Now we see where he learned this crap from.
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Darren Wilson was let go from a police department in Jennings that historically had issues of racial tension, mismanagement and turmoil. The truth is starting to come out. Now we see where he learned this crap from.
Click to expand...
No he wasn't and don't copy and paste trying to pass off anothers words as your own.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/25/us/darren-wilsons-unremarkable-past-offers-few-clues-into-ferguson-shooting.html?_r=0

After attending the police academy, Officer Wilson began work in Jennings, another suburb, in June 2009. Robert Orr, the former chief of the Jennings Police Department, said he had no recollection of Officer Wilson and had to call the mayor last week to jog his memory. “Sure enough, the mayor said he was one of ours,” Mr. Orr said. “That must mean he never got in any trouble, because that’s when they usually came to me.”

Yet Officer Wilson’s formative experiences in policing came in a department that wrestled historically with issues of racial tension, mismanagement and turmoil. During Officer Wilson’s brief tenure, another officer was fired for a wrongful shooting, and a lieutenant was accused of stealing federal funds. In 2011, in the wake of federal and state investigations into the misuse of grant money, the department closed, and the city entered into a contract to be policed by the county. The department was found to have used grant money to pay overtime for D.W.I. checkpoints that never took place.

When the department folded, the county hired 12 of the roughly 40 officers who worked in Jennings. Mr. Wilson was not among them. Instead, in October 2011, he went to Ferguson, where he now makes $45,302 a year.

There, Chief Thomas Jackson has reported no disciplinary actions against him. “He was a gentle, quiet man,” the chief said. “He was a distinguished officer.”
Click to expand...
You obviously only read what you want, do you purposely omit facts or you just got your blinders on?

Using your logic you served a pedophile the other day so you must be one :dunce:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
earnest_voice said:
No he wasn't and don't copy and paste trying to pass off anothers words as your own.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/25/us/darren-wilsons-unremarkable-past-offers-few-clues-into-ferguson-shooting.html?_r=0



You obviously only read what you want, do you purposely omit facts or you just got your blinders on?

Using your logic you served a pedophile the other day so you must be one :dunce:
Click to expand...
idiot he was let go.... the whole department folded due to the fucked police officers they had...including him.
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
idiot he was let go the whole department folded due to the fucked police officers they had...including him.
Click to expand...
Doesn't say he was fired/dismissed. He might not have sought to take up a contract with the county PD. The article implies he sought more money at a bigger dept. - probably left because of all the bullshit, it does not mean he was involved.

Basically your copy and paste amalgamation was false and you edited it to suit your narrative...

 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
earnest_voice said:
Doesn't say he was fired/dismissed. He might not have sought to take up a contract with the county PD. The article implies he sought more money at a bigger dept. - probably left because of all the bullshit, it does not mean he was involved.

Basically your copy and paste amalgamation was false and you edited it to suit your narrative...

Click to expand...
He was let go with all the other officers in that fucked up police department. The county did not even hire him. What part of that are you not understanding.
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
He was let go with all the other officers in that fucked up police department. The county did not even hire him. What part of that are you not understanding.
Click to expand...
You infer alot when you can't even attribute your copy and pastes. Unless you can provide undeniable proof this was the case, not your read in between the laundry lines opinion, you may have a point, BUT, until then keep your zimmerman'esque speculation to yourself.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
earnest_voice said:
You infer alot when you can't even attribute your copy and pastes. Unless you can provide undeniable proof this was the case, not your read in between the laundry lines opinion, you may have a point, BUT, until then keep your zimmerman'esque speculation to yourself.
Click to expand...
a lot ... no such word as alot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top