How come you never mention oha cover oregons little fuck up....you are so proud of your indignation arent you, lol, apopleptic.
Maybe you shoould google the EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011....
My answer is to improve roads?
25,000 miles of logging roads were slated to be violators of the clean water act and therefore were subject to million if not billions cleaning it up, Improving Salmon habitat.
Wyden took the opposite action.
Dams need to be removed of course, quote me where i stated otherwise, but habitat is the othe key component, that wyden doesnt support, quite clearly by just googling EPA Regulatory Relief Act of 2011, but you wont because you would have to shut your lying uneducated trap...
Now, i am satisfied that you are for dropping non sequitars instead of facts, and then twisting facts to make your narrative.....what dams have you personally been involved with? I also,worked on a dam removal on the rouge with water watch a few years ago, so,why would i argue against their removal? Because i dont and again the twisting to suit your attempt at debate, i enjoy your point of view, but you alwys leave out appropriate details....why is that? I could claim somethting other than what you actuallly wrote, like your pattern, but that accomplishes about dick, doesnt it.....