• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Super Tuesday

Who's it gonna be?

  • Biden

    Votes: 12 48.0%
  • Sanders

    Votes: 10 40.0%
  • Trump

    Votes: 3 12.0%

  • Total voters
    25

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
You are really, really lost. Let me try to help.

A system in which the spending of money exceeds actual spendable resources is inherently not capitalist. For free trade to exist, capital to trade freely has to exist. Making up a fake supply of money, is clearly not capitalist.
I just conveyed the actual definition of a word and you said I was lost and proceeded to deliver a word salad with no intellectual value. Your Bernie-loss induced histrionic meltdown is impairing your cognition. Have you considered suicide?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Pleeeeease pay attention this time :


"Governments in the US and Europe are pumping large doses of socialism to clear the mess created by unregulated capitalism. Starting with the taking over of Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and the American International Group, and now a $700-billion bailout package, the US government has put aside close to $1 trillion so far to rescue financial institutions from a mess of their own making. The contagion of bank failures has now spread from the US to Europe."

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/socialism-in-aid-of-capitalism/articleshow/3567492.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Nice article from 2008 that was written as the world economy was melting down and just starting to feel the full effects
Are you going to deny that Fiat currencies ( the US dollar) and Ponzi schemes ( the banking system) , are not examples of unregulated capitalism?
"Fiat Currencies" "Ponzi scheme = banking system".....


You are really, really lost. Let me try to help.

A system in which the spending of money exceeds actual spendable resources is inherently not capitalist. For free trade to exist, capital to trade freely has to exist. Making up a fake supply of money, is clearly not capitalist.
Because you said so? You get a degree from Von Miss institute or something? You do know all that garbage is just right wing propaganda right? Maybe in the last ten years or so it got pushed on the other edge of the political spectrum?

Here is a tip, any economic system that tells you to not trust math is bullshit.




"Dimon should know. He was at the helm when JPMorgan received a $25bn socialist-like bailout in 2008, after it and other Wall Street banks almost tanked because of their reckless loans.

Dimon subsequently agreed to pay the government $13bn to settle charges that the bank overstated the quality of mortgages it was selling to investors in the run-up to the crisis. According to the Justice Department, JPMorgan acknowledged it had regularly and knowingly sold mortgages that should have never been sold. (Presumably this is where the “stagnation, corruption and often worse” comes in.)

The $13bn penalty was chicken feed to the biggest bank on Wall Street, whose profits last year alone amounted to $35bn. Besides, JPMorgan was able to deduct around $11bn of the settlement costs from its taxable income.

To state it another way, Dimon and other Wall Street CEOs helped trigger the 2008 financial crisis when the dangerous and irresponsible loans their banks were peddling – on which they made big money – finally went bust. But instead of letting the market punish the banks (which is what capitalism is supposed to do) the government bailed them out and eventually levied paltry fines which the banks treated as the cost of doing business."
So by picking one of the banks that didn't really need the bailout other than to provide a united front to keep the entire banking system form melting down (because if the few banks that actually needed it due to absorbing losses from the non-banking financial institutions would have been targeted as being weak from taking the funding if no other banks did), then paying it back with interest, is not good enough for you because they didn't pay far more interest?

All because they bought up struggling companies Bear Sterns and Washington Mutual (who has some gnarly lending practices) when the Treasury and Federal Reserve asked them to, in an effort to stop the economy from melting down.

You really should stop reading economics from paperback books and internet blogs/youtube videos. Most of that shit is garbage propaganda.
 
Top