I have to keep the light within a few inches, but there is no drop off in performance/speed for lack of intensity at that level. I don't think that having to keep fluoros close to tops is a new idea either.
I agree +rep, but have some to add.
I believe that using T5s efficiently should involve:
#1 keeping close to the plant - A few inches is even too far IMO. I strive for 1", (though a fast growing plant especially in the stretch phase makes this difficult).
#2 Training/sizing the plant properly. With HIDs, you would likely build your canopy around the footprint of the light on a flat plane. With T5s, this is a little different. The plants have to be kept at size constraints that will allow the T5 to penetrate into the canopy. You can have 4' tall plants that are only 1' wide since lamps on both sides will penetrate into the middle, but if you're only 2' tall, but also 2' wide, the T5s won't work very well as there is no way to make them reach into the middle. Another good example would be a very short SOG. If your canopy is less than 12" tall, the T5s from the top may penetrate evenly, whereas if you let them get any bigger, you won't get light into the bottom of the canopy.
#3 Positioning them evenly, often not just on the top, but also on the sides as well. Since they don't have the penetration that an HID source, or even CFLs do, you need to take advantage of one of their strong points - the ability to spread the light onto the plant fairly evenly. In the SOG example above, you'd try to keep the lighting spread evenly across the area vs. an HID where you'd just put it in the middle.
#4 Taking advantage of another strong point of these lamps, their spectrum and ease-ability to create a custom tailored spectrum grow area.
At least that's how I do it...
I was really shocked to hear an experienced grower so blatently state an
opinion that they will not produce in the same time frame as HIDs.
It doesn't make sense to me - they have a higher lumen per watt than a 600w hps and a better spectrum/PAR value.
If you use them properly, there's no reason why you shouldn't see similar results...