Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
i thought you were a polar bear, not a frog...* la Grande Terreur ... cn
i thought you were a polar bear, not a frog...* la Grande Terreur ... cn
and you continue to display your ignorance.Defending wage slavery is the act of fealty, being a proletarian opposed to unions for example. Being a wage slave is not necessarily. I agree with the assessment of options with which you concluded. Not all serfs swore fealty, but the ones who didn't were surely witches.
You seem to be suggesting two contradictory things. "To long for" connotes "to not have". "To defend" connotes "to have". I thought my arms were shaking, but it's apparently the target that's jinking. cnI said that the tea baggers long for such a dystopia.
I read deep. cni thought you were a polar bear, not a frog...
Sorry we can't live in your alternate universe.Tea Baggers fucking love feudalism.
Actually, I wasn't the one arguing that the dystopia popular among TeaBillies didn't resemble feudalism because serfs swore fealty to their lords. So I agree, it does resemble feudalism.this all went right over your head.
Only rich lords can own land.So, there is no class mobility then? Can children of factory workers become land owners?
Most of you conservatives could be easily turned around by taking a basic sociology class, and learning why money gets easier to accumulate when you already have a lot of it, and the effect that has on the community. Hence why the inner cities are shitholes populated mostly by minorities.Feudalism is birthright of defined class structures, AC can't tell the difference between that and free market capitalism.
You have your shit ass backwards. Communism is a classless society. Capitalism is a society BASED on class structure and authority. Socialism is relatively equal society, where workers own the product of their labor, so that the capitalist class (authority) can't steal it. This creates a far more equal society than capitalism. I'd go hit the books again if I were you. Btw, the Soviet union was not a Socialist or a communist society. It was authoritarian and a dictatorship, where workers did not own the product of their labor, etc, because a bunch of assholes used Marx's fatal flaw of the dictatorship of the proletariat as an excuse to exercise complete control over their citizens. This authority was kept in place by a strong propaganda/misinformation system and national identity. That is a form of right wing socialism. The difference between right and left in a society is that the right considers authority absolutely necessary for society to function and the left does not. If there were no authority (government) in capitalism to protect the capitalist class, what would give their actions any legitimacy? What would give money value? Who would enforce property rights? Who would keep their workers in line when they get rowdy or demand a more equitable share of the wealth that they created?Socialism/Communism is actually a lot more like feudalism, you have your barons (middle class), your dukes (upper middle class), then your kings (upper class). Then you have the workers (everyone else) and nobody can ever move up in society except through inheritance(heirs) and succession, sounds like communism . Lets not forget the military aspect, a key factor in feudalism, you have your knights and their family and so forth which is kind of like the peoples army is it not? In fact just thinking about this feudalism seems entirely in line with stalin.
Most of you progressives could do with a little exposure to real science to help you shake that sociology pixie dust off your eyebrows. When you can integrate the area under the curve you can generally get a job. With sociology, not so much.Most of you conservatives could be easily turned around by taking a basic sociology class, and learning why money gets easier to accumulate when you already have a lot of it, and the effect that has on the community. Hence why the inner cities are shitholes populated mostly by minorities.
Deciphering...Most of you progressives could do with a little exposure to real science to help you shake that sociology pixie dust off your eyebrows. When you can integrate the area under the curve you can generally get a job. With sociology, not so much.
I took calculus in high school 16 years ago. All it will get you is glares from your fellow McDonald's coworkers.Most of you progressives could do with a little exposure to real science to help you shake that sociology pixie dust off your eyebrows. When you can integrate the area under the curve you can generally get a job. With sociology, not so much.
Most of you conservatives could be easily turned around by taking a basic sociology class, and learning why money gets easier to accumulate when you already have a lot of it, and the effect that has on the community. Hence why the inner cities are shitholes populated mostly by minorities.
Hey abandonconflict, somebody is challenging you.You have your shit ass backwards. Communism is a classless society. Capitalism is a society BASED on class structure and authority. Socialism is relatively equal society, where workers own the product of their labor, so that the capitalist class (authority) can't steal it. This creates a far more equal society than capitalism. I'd go hit the books again if I were you. Btw, the Soviet union was not a Socialist or a communist society. It was authoritarian and a dictatorship, where workers did not own the product of their labor, etc, because a bunch of assholes used Marx's fatal flaw of the dictatorship of the proletariat as an excuse to exercise complete control over their citizens. This authority was kept in place by a strong propaganda/misinformation system and national identity. That is a form of right wing socialism. The difference between right and left in a society is that the right considers authority absolutely necessary for society to function and the left does not. If there were no authority (government) in capitalism to protect the capitalist class, what would give their actions any legitimacy? What would give money value? Who would enforce property rights? Who would keep their workers in line when they get rowdy or demand a more equitable share of the wealth that they created?
If you actually knew anything beyond Democratic and Republican politics, you'd understand why that is and you wouldn't sound like such a dumbass.Hey abandonconflict, somebody is challenging you.
LOL, I really liked the "The difference between right and left in a society is that the right considers authority absolutely necessary for society to function and the left does not." That's a good one, lol.
If you actually knew anything beyond Democratic and Republican politics, you'd understand why that is and you wouldn't sound like such a dumbass.