The "D" day pool, best guess as to when Trump is out

DIY-HP-LED

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
SeaOfGreenGold said:
So I just went thru the last 5 pages or so. I really have to say... Some of you are COMPLETELY out of your mind and need to reassess your life and goals. The words that come to mind about some of you are unhinged, delusional and triggered. It is very clear some of you have no idea what you're talking about and when asked to provide evidence, you change the topic or context. People who have those types of social habits can't be reasoned with or even trusted because there is a underlying issue. The issue is those people don't care whether or not what they are defending, is fact or fiction. They just go with whatever the majority of the internet/forum participants are going with. This is called Tribalism. And I am sorry to say, the LEFT have become this way.

Cheers.
Click to expand...
Another sock puppet who was banned for being an arsehole.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
Who do you think mueller will indict next
Click to expand...
DIY-HP-LED said:
Another sock puppet who was banned for being an arsehole.
Click to expand...
Sir Napsalot said:
Up yours
Click to expand...
A fact free post. No wonder the Padawan liked it.

Hey @Padawanbater2 , how many Republican votes will Nancy need to get elected Speaker? I am trying to calculate how much she will owe the Republicans. I don't know why you won't answer this question despite my repeated attempts. We all rely on your expert opinion.
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
SeaOfGreenGold said:
So I just went thru the last 5 pages or so. I really have to say... Some of you are COMPLETELY out of your mind and need to reassess your life and goals. The words that come to mind about some of you are unhinged, delusional and triggered. It is very clear some of you have no idea what you're talking about and when asked to provide evidence, you change the topic or context. People who have those types of social habits can't be reasoned with or even trusted because there is a underlying issue. The issue is those people don't care whether or not what they are defending, is fact or fiction. They just go with whatever the majority of the internet/forum participants are going with. This is called Tribalism. And I am sorry to say, the LEFT have become this way.

Cheers.
Click to expand...
and you are qualified to make these statement because?.....you're not just another guy, talking out of his ass? like the rest of us?.....
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Opinion
Time for G.O.P. to Threaten to Fire Trump
Republican leaders need to mount an intervention.
By Thomas L. Friedman
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/24/opinion/impeach-fire-president-trump.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Up to now I have not favored removing President Trump from office. I felt strongly that it would be best for the country that he leave the way he came in, through the ballot box. But last week was a watershed moment for me, and I think for many Americans, including some Republicans.

It was the moment when you had to ask whether we really can survive two more years of Trump as president, whether this man and his demented behavior — which will get only worse as the Mueller investigation concludes — are going to destabilize our country, our markets, our key institutions and, by extension, the world. And therefore his removal from office now has to be on the table.

I believe that the only responsible choice for the Republican Party today is an intervention with the president that makes clear that if there is not a radical change in how he conducts himself — and I think that is unlikely — the party’s leadership will have no choice but to press for his resignation or join calls for his impeachment.

It has to start with Republicans, given both the numbers needed in the Senate and political reality. Removing this president has to be an act of national unity as much as possible — otherwise it will tear the country apart even more. I know that such an action is very difficult for today’s G.O.P., but the time is long past for it to rise to confront this crisis of American leadership.
more...
Click to expand...
as of the 3rd, Commander Chaos' wings are clipped = nothing more for GOP = see ya wouldn't want to be ya.

they're almost as despicable as he is.
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
because you're so fvcking annoying he has you on ignore.
Click to expand...
Or perhaps it is because I actually ask him about his moronic statements that he can't answer - much like I do with Tty and yourself.
Maybe you can answer the question. You seemed very upset about it at the time.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
TheGreenGreek said:
Racist, Nazi, White Supremacist, Stupid, Inept, Sociopath, Liar, Traitor, Fear Monger, Draft Dodger etc... This is the LEFT for you lol. These are the words they have on deck for the moment they lose an argument or can't debate at all.
Click to expand...
Truth hurts..so does love..if the shoe fits?

 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
Lol, defines tacit then asks for direct quotes.
Click to expand...
fine...find a place i imply support for trump.....i find him morally reprehensible, and have for a long time before he ever thought about a political career....but how would you know that, you're busy judging people you don't know
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
fine...find a place i imply support for trump.....i find him morally reprehensible, and have for a long time before he ever thought about a political career....but how would you know that, you're busy judging people you don't know
Click to expand...
How about your eugenics rant? that’s pretty liberal
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
How about your eugenics rant? that’s pretty liberal
Click to expand...
what about it? never said i was a liberal, or a conservative....find one place, tacit or straight the fuck out, where i've ever supported trump?
redirect all you want....i own everything i've ever said....everyone here has already heard it....nothing on the planet pisses me off more than a hypocrite, so i do my best not to be one....and you've called me one, so i'd like you to provide some proof....and stay on point....i'm an asshole...opinionated....we all know that already....find me supporting trump.....¿
 
Roger A. Shrubber

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-most-workers-affected-by-shutdown-are-democrats.....

so our commander in chief thinks it's ok to shut down the government, because most of the government employs it effects are democrats?......do i even need to start the rant?......just another fucking ridiculous reason for a ridiculous fucking asshole to do a ridiculous fucking thing.....that these "justifications" even occur to trump are proof that he's mentally about 7 years old....."it's ok to do bad things to bad people".......even though the only thing in the world that makes those people bad are that they don't support donnie. doesn't matter to trump that those people have families....doesn't occur to trump that a lot of non government employs are effected by the shutdown...or that a lot of them aren't democrats......it seems like very little occurs to trump that doesn't have to do with his very narrow focus.....
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
TacoMac said:
Obviously not or you wouldn't be quoting him and arguing with him.
Click to expand...
no, he is..there's a 'show' button at the bottom, in case you need to see which moron a normal member is responding to, in order to understand the conversation, you can.

i use it sparingly.

you are not on my ignore list.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
Michael Cohen’s visiting Prague would be a huge development in the Russia investigation
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2018/04/14/michael-cohen-visiting-prague-would-be-a-huge-development-in-the-russia-investigation/?utm_term=.ceb5e37a5396

McClatchy reported on Friday evening that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s team has evidence of a trip by President Trump’s personal lawyer to Prague in the late summer of 2016. Overseas travel to non-Russian countries might strike some observers as an incremental — if not unimportant — development in Mueller’s probe. That is not the case. Confirmation that Cohen visited Prague could be quite significant.

A trip to Prague by Cohen was included in the dossier of reports written by former British intelligence official Christopher Steele. Those reports, paid for by an attorney working for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, included a broad array of raw intelligence, much of which has not been corroborated and much of which would probably defy easy corroboration, focusing on internal political discussions in the Kremlin.

Cohen’s visiting Prague, though, is concrete. Over the course of three of the dossier’s 17 reports, the claim is outlined — but we hasten to note that these allegations have not been confirmed by The Washington Post.

It suggests that Cohen took over management of the relationship with Russia after campaign chairman Paul Manafort was fired from the campaign in August (because of questions about his relationship with a political party in Ukraine). Cohen is said to have met secretly with people in Prague — possibly at the Russian Center for Science and Culture — in the last week of August or the first of September. He allegedly met with representatives of the Russian government, possibly including officials of the Presidential Administration Legal Department; Oleg Solodukhin (who works with the Russian Center for Science and Culture); or Konstantin Kosachev, head of the foreign relations committee in the upper house of parliament. A planned meeting in Moscow, the dossier alleges, was considered too risky, given that a topic of conversation was how to divert attention from Manafort’s links to Russia and a trip to Moscow by Carter Page in July. Another topic of conversation, according to the dossier: allegedly paying off “Romanian hackers” who had been targeting the Clinton campaign.

There is a lot there — but it hinged on Cohen’s having traveled to Prague. If he was not in Prague, none of this happened. If he visited Prague? Well, then we go a level deeper.

McClatchy notes that there is no evidence of who, if anyone, Cohen met with, but that the time frame was in late August or early September, as the dossier suggests.

More...
Click to expand...
Confirmed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top