Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
when you stretch out the tiny, 10,000 year period on this:
![]()
to a different x-axis (10k years instead of 800K+ years), it looks smoother. like this.
![]()
and if you narrow that graph even further and smooth it, you get this.
![]()
note that years before present are rearranged. this should help you in understanding that yo uare saying exactly what i am saying.
just because you are an idiot does not make the graph fake. you are simply too retarded to understand graphs or exponents apparently.
graph 1: specious and irrelevant to the discussion at hand.
graph 2: your usual brand of bullshit.
graph 3: NOT "narrowed"
my graph from noaa covers EXACTLY THE SAME TIME SCALE, (to whit: 10,000 years) as yours.
your skeptical science graph bears no relation to the one from noaa, and yet purports to be based on noaa's numbers.
it's still bullshit.
and since i have demonstrated this many times before, yet you STILL trotted out the skeptical science graph, that would be a LIE.
also, werent you explaining how the IPCC's own numbers are somehow fraudulent? where did that go?