The flush "myth"

R

RegurgedCumBubble

Member
Guy I talk facts, not fiction! I came to talk to people that actually know the science behind the cannabis plant. There clearly isn't a speck of knowledge between the people that are refuting the common knowledge facts that I've produced. I won't waste my time! You guys keep doing your thing, and we'll do our. I can't see you way down there lol
 
Kingrow1

Kingrow1

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
That's pretty much what I was going to say.
Click to expand...
Thats skill level unfortunately, nature is way more precise and how come most my fruit and veg looks identical and grows to exact time, environment and nute scales.

Ive always disbelieved that, we just aint as top grade growers as we think, still we do a reasonable job....
 
CannaBruh

CannaBruh

Well-Known Member
MichiganMedGrower said:
The nutes are in a different ionic form in the plant. Only mobile nutes move obviously but they are transported where the plant needs them. Not all to the buds just cause a leaf yellows.

And the taste would be heavy grass. Chlorophyll.

All flushing during ripening can do is starve the roots so the plant yellows. Go too long and the plant will cannibalize itself. If the chlorophyll is lower. The buds will taste smoother longer. But if the plant was starved before done it won't be close to its potential for potency or flavor/smell.

When I used to overfeed plants. I agreed with the pro flush side. I was wrong. It can be higher quality if fed properly to the end.
Click to expand...
Have you tried "fed properly" with a mild flushing at the very end? That's more or less what I do but the mild is severe and it can be 1-2 weeks to only a few days, completely arbitrary as the plant dictates not a calendar. No doubt you probably grow some fire with your regimen.
 
R

RegurgedCumBubble

Member
I respect that fully King, that's why most come to talk. But when guys start refuting the basic anatomy of the cannabis plant and why the theory of flushing may or may not be beneficial, then their credibility become shot. If you don't know how the plant operates, how are people going to tell me if flushing or not flushing is a good procedure!
 
Last edited:
R

RegurgedCumBubble

Member
For someone to tell me trace elements, carbon build up and metals aren't present in a plant that is feed these compounds is comical. If there isn't any elements in your soil your ppm meter will not get a reading because pure water without microbes cant have a reading, PPM meters are electro magnetic and starts reading ppm when microbes are present. If you get a ppm reading, you have elements in your medium witch in turn convert to trace elements, metals and carbon in your plant as it eats. Flushing is the theory of reducing these things, and all I wanted to know is what others thought are but what I've gotten so far is people that don't even know how the plants cells operate! And these are the same people telling me how it goes lol
 
Last edited:
R

RegurgedCumBubble

Member
I do like a good argument and clear I won here today because facts are facts! And now most will know that you are very amateur and uneducated when it comes to the very thing your talking about. I do appreciate a good laugh!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top