how is that working out so far?Wasting time and space with minimal yields is usually our goal!
What am I missing about all of this? The setup is tight but what is the benefit in the end?
I see two math issues arise..the first is having a significant decrease in canopy depth right? Also, buds growing radially actually lose canopy space as they grow toward the bulb? I am just curious I have only heard people talk about it. Can u pull 3x more?Instead of 16 square feet of canopy space I have 43..... That's what your missing. I have 86 sq feet of canopy getting prime light intensity, and I'm only using 2-600s edit: and even the 16 sq feet set up horizontally there are big swings in light intensity from the center of the canopy directly under the bulb to the outsides towards the walls.
The plants spin around?Not much depth but from good intensity the nugs get pretty solid. The screen is there to keep the plants from growing into the light. we shall see what I pull.
I dont know how the plants are trained or placed. My guess is no, but I also think in 3 dimensions. Actually, I think you just want a bunch of complements on building a box. Think about this 2.5 times the canopy space and 50% less depth is a wash.....Think about it.
I can but it doesn't look done because I dont know what done looks like. It is not as if that wouldn't be beneficial or difficult to engineer. Think about it.Can you see the pictures?