The Hillary & Bill Clinton legacy

Walterwhiter

Well-Known Member
Wtf are you talking about.

Show me the records of the porn actors or we chalk it up to more underage homeless boys that have fallen prey to your promises of food and shelter, and your 05% NAMBLA rating stands. While your at it, lets see those 911 convictions you couldnt source, and just for shits and giggles, lets hear you explain how banks and credit unions work. That was fucking hillarious.
:bigjoint::clap::hump:
Banking is nothing more than financial slavery
 

MadNyeTheHydroGuy

Active Member
why are you neo-nazis so offended when you get called out as the racist, anti-semitic shitbags that you are?

do i need to be more politically correct?
Why are all NAMBLA members so defensive of their right to have deep, meaningful relationships with young underage boys? I guess ppl are just passionate about what they love.

Got those porn actors records?
911 convictions?
Care to regale us with another tale of your magic money tree bank?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Care to debunk with source?
debunk the source? The fingerprints of propaganda are all over that thing.

First off, there is no context whatsoever. It's common today for political organizations to monitor what people on the other side say and pull their statements into that sort of shit show to embarass them and to discredit them in other situations. What I saw was an old man who wasn't guarded with his words and who misspoke in one instance. The Hillary laughing in flames at the end, what a ridiculous and laughable ending. It was cringe-worthy yet I'm sure you thought it "was great".

The bit that was the best example of propaganda was where Soros got confused in his words and played into the hands of whomever made that video. Clearly the interview took place in January or February when Trump was gaining the votes needed to win the nomination but hadn't yet done so. What Soros said and the video producers pounced on was that " trump will win the election by a LANDSLIDE", yet not even place in the electoral college. Taken out of context, it seems that he's talking about rigging the general election, and you are pouncing on that.

But, look at when he said those words. He was saying that Trump will win the election by a landslide to be the candidate for the Republican Party and lose the general election. This is why it is propaganda. So, go away, shithead. Refute what I saw but you are wrong.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
debunk the source? The fingerprints of propaganda are all over that thing.

First off, there is no context whatsoever. It's common today for political organizations to monitor what people on the other side say and pull their statements into that sort of shit show to embarass them and to discredit them in other situations. What I saw was an old man who wasn't guarded with his words and who misspoke in one instance. The Hillary laughing in flames at the end, what a ridiculous and laughable ending. It was cringe-worthy yet I'm sure you thought it "was great".

The bit that was the best example of propaganda was where Soros got confused in his words and played into the hands of whomever made that video. Clearly the interview took place in January or February when Trump was gaining the votes needed to win the nomination but hadn't yet done so. What he said and the video producers pounced on was that " trump will win the election by a LANDSLIDE", yet not even place in the electoral college. Taken out of context, it seems that he's talking about rigging the general election, and you are pouncing on that.

But, look at when he said those words. He was saying that Trump will win the election by a landslide to be the candidate for the Republican Party and lose the general election. This is why it is propaganda. So, go away, shithead. Refute what I saw but you are wrong.
wasting your breath man. just post gay porn.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
wasting your breath man. just post gay porn.
Maybe somebody else will read it and figure out what was going on?

OK probably not. I just can't help trying to debunk shit like that. My form of entertainment, I guess. I'll just put those shithead on ignore eventually when I tire of them. Right now, it's a learning process for me.

So, fuckem.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Debunk WITH source. WITH source. I can claim anything is propaganda, and facts can be true and still be used in propaganda. But come on, this is Soros we are talking about here. SOROS. Debunk that man and i will spread my asscheeks for you, and not just post underage porn like UncleCuck
You don't need to do anything like that. You aren't my type. So you just present your ass to your other white supremacists and keep your diseases in the family, please.

I gave my reasoning for what was wrong with that video. It was a piece of shit. As far as debating you, we aren't even on the same planet. You are lost in some strange world of whatevers. I stick to facts. What Soros said was that Trump would win the nomination by a landslide, which at the time was pretty good telling of what eventually happened. The next thing he said was Clinton would win the national election by a landslide, which is also true.
 
Top