The Judge Asks, Where is the OutRage?

Murfy

Murfy

Well-Known Member
cheap and easy-

is what i would call drone tech.

add in the new led cloaking tech, and DING DING DING we've got a winner.


[video=youtube;YX4gBelv-ZE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX4gBelv-ZE[/video]
 
Murfy

Murfy

Well-Known Member
cloaking-

also, cheap and easy.

[video=youtube;PD83dqSfC0Y]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PD83dqSfC0Y&feature=related[/video]
 
SketchyGrower

SketchyGrower

Well-Known Member
the government use to drug people at random in public bars with LSD. To think that a little forum propaganda is out of the question is a bit silly.....no?
 
B

bob harris

Well-Known Member
Murfy said:
bob harris- is a disinformation agent. i can use a proof that leads to truth on it. my guess is homeland security.
Click to expand...
Murph..I'm just a regular guy, that may post the most accurate info on the Forum... Love to see your "proof" though
 
0

01merc

Active Member
I see it like this.... if the gov. starts using them for general use as for war but not to gain control or constrict my and many others lives.... Its like a kid if you let them jump on the bed once their going to try it again... Which is how are gov. is if nothings said and this is allowed you all know damn well their going to keep going further and further with it. Along with that, what will stem from this? what will they develop next or do that will derive from drones?
 
B

bob harris

Well-Known Member
01merc said:
I see it like this.... if the gov. starts using them for general use as for war but not to gain control or constrict my and many others lives.... Its like a kid if you let them jump on the bed once their going to try it again... Which is how are gov. is if nothings said and this is allowed you all know damn well their going to keep going further and further with it. Along with that, what will stem from this? what will they develop next or do that will derive from drones?
Click to expand...
Hey..i see that analogy in how medical patients have acted...jumping on the bed (med law)..now when the State says 'stop jumping on the bed(med law)...the patients go further and further with it...yet somehow when the spankin comes..they kids won't deserve it...
 
gladstoned

gladstoned

Well-Known Member
The government said no beds. We built beds. We slept on them and jumped on them, cuz they are ares. The government said well you can have the beds, just don't jump on them. We said what are you talking about, this is my bed. Go build your own bed cuz you can also go fuck yourself on it. Leave my bed alone, don't worry about my bed, my dresser, or anything in my entire bedroom you cock suckers.

There is my analogy.
 
B

bob harris

Well-Known Member
gladstoned said:
The government said no beds. We built beds. We slept on them and jumped on them, cuz they are ares. The government said well you can have the beds, just don't jump on them. We said what are you talking about, this is my bed. Go build your own bed cuz you can also go fuck yourself on it. Leave my bed alone, don't worry about my bed, my dresser, or anything in my entire bedroom you cock suckers.

There is my analogy.
Click to expand...
The government then said...but it's a big house, and you are making so much noise that the people down stairs can't sleep ...and plaster is falling off their ceiling...do you not care about anyone but yourself?
 
B

bob harris

Well-Known Member
Hitlersmidget said:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks

there ya go .. This is completely untrue! Do not agree with this! Did you know that the US Army will pay for your student loans? They did for me! I sure am glad I joined the US Army!
Click to expand...
Centcom spokesman Commander Bill Speaks said: "The technology supports classified blogging activities on foreign-language websites to enable Centcom to counter violent extremist and enemy propaganda outside the US."
He said none of the interventions would be in English, as it would be unlawful to "address US audiences" with such technology, and any English-language use of social media by Centcom was always clearly attributed. The languages in which the interventions are conducted include Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto.

That is a quote from your article...nothing to do with the US citizen..it's about foreign affairs..national defense if you will.
 
Timmahh

Timmahh

Well-Known Member
The Homeland Security Department ordered so many drones it can’t keep them all flying and doesn’t have a good plan for how to use them, according to a new audit that the department’s inspector general released Monday.In a blunt assessment, investigators said Customs and Border Protection's Office of Air and Marine has a fleet of nine “unmanned aircraft systems” and is awaiting a 10th — though it doesn’t have enough ground support and doesn’t have a good plan for prioritizing missions.“CBP procured unmanned aircraft before implementing adequate plans,” the investigators said.The Defense Department uses armed drones overseas in the war on terrorism, but American law enforcement agencies are increasingly turning to them for use in detecting or preventing crimes at home. At the same time, they are butting heads with civil libertarians who worry about intrusion into innocent citizens’ private lives.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/11/border-agency-overextended-drone-program/
 
Timmahh

Timmahh

Well-Known Member
Looks like the Governor of Indiana is a tad peeved.

http://rt.com/usa/news/indiana-shooting-law-state-591/

Hold onto your holsters, folks: shooting a cop dead is now legal in the state of Indiana.Governor Mitch Daniels, a Republican, has authorized changes to a 2006 legislation that legalizes the use of deadly force on a public servant — including an officer of the law — in cases of “unlawful intrusion.” Proponents of both the Second and Fourth Amendments — those that allow for the ownership of firearms and the security against unlawful searches, respectively — are celebrating the update by saying it ensures that residents are protected from authorities that abuse the powers of the badge.
Others, however, fear that the alleged threat of a police state emergence will be replaced by an all-out warzone in Indiana.
Under the latest changes of the so-called Castle Doctrine, state lawmakers agree “people have a right to defend themselves and third parties from physical harm and crime.” Rather than excluding officers of the law, however, any public servant is now subject to be met with deadly force if they unlawfully enter private property without clear justification.
“In enacting this section, the general assembly finds and declares that it is the policy of this state to recognize the unique character of a citizen's home and to ensure that a citizen feels secure in his or her own home against unlawful intrusion by another individual or a public servant,” reads the legislation.
Although critics have been quick to condemn the law for opening the door for assaults on police officers, supporters say that it is necessary to implement the ideals brought by America’s forefathers. Especially, argue some, since the Indiana Supreme Court almost eliminated the Fourth Amendment entirely last year. During the 2011 case of Barnes v. State of Indiana, the court ruled that a man who assaulted an officer dispatched to his house had broken the law before therewas “no right to reasonably resist unlawful entry by police officers.” In turn, the National Rifle Association lobbied for an amendment to the Castle Doctrine to ensure that residents were protected from officers that abuse the law to grant themselves entry into private space.
“There are bad legislators,” the law’s author, State Senator R. Michael Young (R) tells Bloomberg News. “There are bad clergy, bad doctors, bad teachers, and it’s these officers that we’re concerned about that when they act outside their scope and duty that the individual ought to have a right to protect themselves.”
Governor Daniels agrees with the senator in a statement offered through his office, and notes that the law is only being established to cover rare incidents of police abuse that can escape the system without reprimand for officers or other persons that break the law to gain entry.
“In the real world, there will almost never be a situation in which these extremely narrow conditions are met,” Daniels says. “This law is not an invitation to use violence or force against law enforcement officers.”
Officers in Indiana aren’t necessarily on the same page, though. “If I pull over a car and I walk up to it and the guy shoots me, he’s going to say, ‘Well, he was trying to illegally enter my property,’” Sergeant Joseph Hubbard tells Bloomberg. “Somebody is going get away with killing a cop because of this law.”
“It’s just a recipe for disaster,” Indiana State Fraternal Order of Police President Tim Downs adds. “It just puts a bounty on our heads.”
​
Click to expand...
 
Murfy

Murfy

Well-Known Member
bob-

does being you feel all slimey and smell like shit?

this thread is about drones. you a needa lay off the sativa, man.

the proof was, drones are cheap and easy.

obviously, you position in the universe is such that, you are accustomed to altering peoples logic through suggestive perseverance. honestly the thought of it sickens me. that's why i bet on hls.
 
B

bob harris

Well-Known Member
Murfy said:
bob-

does being you feel all slimey and smell like shit?

this thread is about drones. you a needa lay off the sativa, man.

the proof was, drones are cheap and easy.

obviously, you position in the universe is such that, you are accustomed to altering peoples logic through suggestive perseverance. honestly the thought of it sickens me. that's why i bet on hls.
Click to expand...
This thread is not about drones..you silly man. It's about spreading "fear the government" propaganda..it's about how we should all be mad, all of the time, and blame others for our hardships....you really have not read much of timmahh's work, have you?
 
canndo

canndo

Well-Known Member
bob harris said:
Wow..lets see you back up that statement.
Click to expand...

There are at least three known incidents of "government" paying people to broadcast their "views", The one that comes to mind is Armstrong Williams and the "no child left behind" "scandal" where Bush paid him to promote the program on television and radio. Michael McMannus and Maggie Gallagher come to mind as well. If there were three there may well have been more, but three should suffice to prove that it does happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top