The coming world leader commonly known as the Antichrist has at least 33 titles ascribed to him in the Old Testament and 13 titles in the New, yet despite what some may think, he is only called the "Antichrist" five times in all of Scripture and all of those are found within the epistles of John, possibly the same man who wrote Revelation where Antichrist is then called "the Beast". However, there are two more titles in particular that reappear four times between Isaiah and Revelation which further intrigue. The coming Antichrist is called a "Prince" in Daniel 9:26-27; "the people of the Prince that shall come shall destroy the City and the Sanctuary," yet he is also called a "King" in Revelation 17:8; "the King who was, is not, yet will be again." This shows us that the coming Antichrist is not just metaphorically called a King, as some believe, but that he will move through the normal procession of a monarchial tradition, being first a European Prince, and then a King. Daniel 9:26-27, which makes a double-prophecy whose first fulfillment came in 70 AD when the ancient Roman 'Prince'
Titus Vespasian and his armies destroyed both Jerusalem and the Temple ('the City and the Sanctuary'), yet its future and final fulfillment shall occur when the Antichrist himself has
his people, his armies, destroy that future Third Temple in Jerusalem. The Scriptures use this kind of dual-layered prophecy more than once, yet it has always confused people yet we know the prophecy in Daniel is referring to the Antichrist because of Christ's own prophetically coded language found within Matthew 24:3-33 (among others) in which he links Daniel's entire prophecy about the "Abomination of Desolation," the future "Prince to come," to be the end-time Antichrist, and the key to unlocking that truth is found in verse three "As He sat upon the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, Tell us when shall these things be? What shall be the sign of thy coming and of the
end of the world?"
As with most prophetic Scripture (especially those found in Daniel) God always makes a way for the correct interpretation to be known. In this instance, Christ made it clearly known what was meant by Daniel's prophecy when providing the interpretation that there were two distinct destructions coming upon Israel, the first by a Roman and his Roman army, the later fulfillment in the endtimes by the Antichrist, a European Prince that arises out of a nation formerly included in the ancient Roman Empire. Interestingly, London itself was actually created and founded by the Romans around 33 AD, the same year Christ was crucified. It quickly became a large industrial Roman port city linking London directly to Rome. After which, Rome then flooded thousands of troops into England, thru their new city stronghold where they conquered ancient Britain north to Hadrian's Wall. Biblical prophecy authors and researchers have debated for decades announcing that the Antichrist must be a Roman, and arise out of Rome, from their linear understanding of the Scriptures in Daniel and Revelation. A more careful look at those same prophecies however clearly indicate that the coming Prince arises out of a nation (and city) that was part of the ancient Roman Empire, not Rome itself. The fact that London was actually created by Roman hands does lend an interesting connection and shows us that London became, in effect, the '
New Rome.' As Rome and the Roman Empire itself waned in power, England and its new capital city of London gained power, prestige, and global influence. Today, we have a Prince and soon-to-be King about to rise from this ancient Roman nation whose power still stretches across "many waters."
Add to this, certain facts now surfacing attempting to expose the secretive Occult factions behind the American and British Governments, and their intelligence agencies, whose end goal is the creation of a British-led Anglo-Empire uniting the world in 'peace' while bringing forth an Aryan-Arthurian figure to the forefront after a great global destruction, at a time when the world is weakened enough and in need of such a leader, and we have all the makings of the ultimate conspiracy. We aren't told who this future ruler might be, yet the Occult underground is supposedly preparing their ranks for a young and charismatic Prince who will be seen in the future as a King Arthur returned. The account of Arthur as a Future King who returns to lead his people out of a new dark age is thought to have its origins in the 5th century defeat of the Celts by the Anglo-Saxon invaders of Britain. Hence, the early Welsh stanza 'Concealed til Doomsday is the grave of Arthur. It is certain that by Malory's time, this same legend of a future return attained a near Messianic tone when he wrote King Arthur is not dead, but shall come again and win the Holy Cross. I will not say it shall be so, but rather I will say there is written upon his tomb this verse: Hic Jacet Arthurus, Rex Quondam, Rexque Futurus... Here lies Arthur, the Once and Future King." Add to this a historic and documented account of Arthur's grave having been found at Glastonbury in 1191 and the myth begins to fade leaving traces of a real King whose prophesied return is actually taken very seriously by those in the Occult.
