Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
You're right. Laws shouldn't have so many labels. There should be no such thing as a carjacker in the laws, only a guy who really needs to get some place and is vehicle impared! Why judge people like that?if that is the reason for the limit it is judgmental and all the more reason to vote no.
Seriously though. That label exists without prop 19 already.
Again, pop quiz. If you get caught carrying more than an ounce without a medical card currently in California you get charged with intent to ____. I'll give you a hint. The word starts with an "s" and ends with an "L". You can do it!
Hard to sell someone a pound if you have to make 16 trips to their house. I guess it doesn't stop drug dealing, it just makes the process really really slow. loli don't understand how the limit will stop drug dealing, care to enlighten me. if you can. or you can spin off in another direction.
yes, lets do that. Please, lets here about why people walk around with more than an ounce for personal consumption.the whole prop is based around a one ounce limit. lets address it a little deeper than "only drug dealers need more".
No. Because you are in compliance with prop 215 right? That's medicinal use. What does prop 19 say about medical possession?i made butter yesterday. i make 2 pounds at a time because it is a long process. i split it up and freeze it to use over several months time. i use 4 ounces of bud. so now because i make butter. i'm a drug dealer?
To make it more fun lets do it like this. Lets pretend you don't have a 215 card and you just harvested you 5x5 garden and made 2 pounds of butter. Guess what? As long as you keep it in the same place you grow it, then you're still in compliance with the laws made in prop 19!
Now if you take your 2 pounds of butter to the park, then yes, you're either a drug dealer or you have a strange butter fetish. Why else would you bring 2 pounds of butter to the park?
Stating that doesn't make it true.your reasoning is flawed.