Kaptain Kron
Well-Known Member
lol i hope to god they dont assign mods that know NOTHING about LED's lol that would drive me nuts.
lol whatever your a dickno its your asanine and ignorant behavior that does, if you wanna tag along and actually not just run your mouth just to hear yourself talk please feel free. But if your here to troll this thread like you have single LED thread on this forum that pops up then i would appreciate it if you would take it elswhere.
Upfront yes very expensive. Average it out over the long haul (if you're lights are under a 3 year or more warranty) and with power savings, reduced cost of electricity, and the money you would have spent replacing HPS or CFL bulbs and possibly ballasts over that period and it averages itself out. Used to use 2 400w hps plus heavy cfl side lighting. Switched to all LED (690w of actual output), totally replaced the old rig and the resulting product is equal in terms of weight and slightly better in quality.I think that technology is a few years off from being reasonably affordable (this coming from a guy who thinks a couple grand for the right light is reasonable). That being said, man, this looks impressive!! Very exciting stuff, I just think it's a ways away from us, sadly. Awesome post at any rate! Thanks for the info, very intriguing.
View attachment 1795005
Upfront yes very expensive. Average it out over the long haul (if you're lights are under a 3 year or more warranty) and with power savings, reduced cost of electricity, and the money you would have spent replacing HPS or CFL bulbs and possibly ballasts over that period and it averages itself out. Used to use 2 400w hps plus heavy cfl side lighting. Switched to all LED (690w of actual output), totally replaced the old rig and the resulting product is equal in terms of weight and slightly better in quality.
To speak to the argument earlier - is it better to have several smaller wattage panels vs. one larger. For my garden I'd rather have more smaller (130-200w actual output still using 3w chipsets) panels for the modular set up. I only grow four autos at a time and when one is done and can refocus my lights on the remaining plants (see pic)
i was going leave it be but he had to jump in callin me names again....lol so F*ck him its his theard not mine if he thinks hes punishing me by filling it with BS arguments with me then thats a laugh...So you wanna be a dick after i let it die so be it.....
Most definitely! When I said overpriced, I meant that light in particular. I would assume they're using fewer, way more powerful LED's than the 3w we use in our grow rooms. Which could mean much better penetration by the light, but, unfortunately, as you go up past 3w LED's the price starts increasing exponentially. I DO agree with everything you said though, about the 3w LED's were using to grow as of now.View attachment 1795005
Upfront yes very expensive. Average it out over the long haul (if you're lights are under a 3 year or more warranty) and with power savings, reduced cost of electricity, and the money you would have spent replacing HPS or CFL bulbs and possibly ballasts over that period and it averages itself out. Used to use 2 400w hps plus heavy cfl side lighting. Switched to all LED (690w of actual output), totally replaced the old rig and the resulting product is equal in terms of weight and slightly better in quality.
To speak to the argument earlier - is it better to have several smaller wattage panels vs. one larger. For my garden I'd rather have more smaller (130-200w actual output still using 3w chipsets) panels for the modular set up. I only grow four autos at a time and when one is done and can refocus my lights on the remaining plants (see pic)
Irishboy's got nothin on the wizard!Dude, no offense but we should not be relying on irishboy's journals for anything because they fucking blow. They prove nothing other than that he's in bed with GLH.
And my comment wasn't about glh lights. It was about irish's journal and how I believe it holds no real value.
Lol a tad bit defensive over irish aren't we? I'm just saying his journals are terribly written with very little science backing the stuff he says. Don't tell me that you know how long i've been looking at his grows...i've been following his "sponsored" grows since 09 and it was evident then that he was a GLH promoter. I'm not going to make any accusations about supplementing hps to boost his results or photoshop the pics, not even sure where you got that from? Why should I be scared that glh lights are good products? I don't fear technology lol. Pretty nugs, yes. Shitty journal, yes. I give him props for being a decent grower, but he is not some led weed mastermind that demands my respect and his journals are written like a first grader that english is their secondary language.
*kill them with kindness.. it works.. why do you think they shot gandhi in the face.. dude was wearing flipflops and sheets.. --- cause it works.. it drives morons insane..ok man i got nothin against that im just sayin the way you stated it sounded like you had a bit of a grudge or something against those panels, i still dont see how you could say it holds no real value, maybe as a journal for unbiased comparison of panels its no real value but hes still growin with led's and it takes certain techniques to succeed properly in doing so he obviously must know some of them or be refining some of them as i have been or he wouldnt be using leds at all. LED's takes a different style to grow than HPS this is what this thread is meant to be about. Referencing irishs journal in that light, i dont see how your comment makes sense is all.
You won't find Irishboy's journals published in any Horticulture textbooks. That being said, they're not worthless by any means. There IS a middle ground. Grow journals don't need complete scientific data to be useful. Could he run more tests and publish the results? Yea. Could he spend more time making his posts more present-able? Yea. Are his posts completely garbage because he DIDN'T do these things? No.