bravedave
Well-Known Member
Let's dial this back. You brought the puke into the equation here, not I. You asked for my opinion on YOUR analogy and I give an answer from my experience and seeing the experience of others...and that makes me a crybaby. Was I suppose to lie?What if I had an extreme aversion to marshmallows and took massive offense to that comment? What if I was in prison and "marshmallow" was a term for a dude that'll roast your weiner? You dont get to pick whats offensive or not, the person you're offending gets to decide how offensive your comment was, but thats not what we are talking about and your analogy sucks ass dude.
Smut is smut man and its not allowed... So no matter how hard you try I'm not gonna see it your way racistboy... everyone isnt like you and that should be ok buddy
Your silly reluctance to accept my hyperbolic analogy has you admitting to a lack of moral clarity (and immaturity) If we can't trust you to handle the easy ones, why should anyone think you could handle the tough ones?
I made no assertions as to levels of smut and have not mentioned the pics at all. You asserting I did is disingenuous. Nice try. That said, I know nothing about any pics here, but to imply that there are no differences in smut levels also is not ignorant but moronic. But sure, if any level was against the rules, that again seems to fall at the mods feet as to how it was handled...but maybe its just me.
Again, though I don't know the whole story...I certainly will not be relying on your version.