Yeah, this idea that sun light is always better than anything man made is incorrect. Like tusseltussel mentioned, with the sun there are many factors which determine how many lumens the plant(s) receive. The number you most often hear is that the sun outputs approx. 10000 lumens per sq. foot, but you must take into account that this number is based on peak afternoon daylight in June/July on a cloudless day. The suns output is reduced to 1000 LUX or 1000 lumens/sq. foot on an overcast day. So if you factor in that this is March, and that this guy is in a cloudy area, he's probably receiving less than 1000 lumens/sq. foot on average and this is only during peak hours (3 or 4 hours maybe). Now, let's take the 600w HPS scenario. Say you've got a 600w HPS that outputs 86000 total lumens, and your room is 16 sq. ft (4ft.x4ft.). That would work out to 86000/16 = 5375 lumens/sq.ft. The beauty of artificial lighting is that, in this case, the plant will be receiving 5375 lumens for a full 18 hours. No doubt, an HPS doesn't have the spectrum, nor the penetrating factor that sunlight has, but unless you're growing 4+ ft. tall trees, then an HPS will have sufficient penetration.
So in summary, it would make more sense to leave the plants under the HPS until summer.