I think it was touched on once, but don't neglect the difference in growing styles. HID penetrate better than T5's. This is unquestionable, it's simply the physics of having X number of watts coming from a few cm^3 opposed to X number of watts coming from 1000cm^3 (these numbers are made up
). To flower with T5's you have to grow completely differently. You want short bushy plants that spread out under the light instead of going up. Think scrog, sog, or severe lst/pruning. As long as you can keep the light penetrating well, and have enough tubes with good reflectors, t5's can match HID output. It just takes manipulation to maintain the proper distance to compensate for the lack of penetration.
On temperature, I find a lot of people don't really understand light and heat. Watt for watt HID and flo put out the same heat. As I mentioned earlier T5's run at a PF around .5-.65 (50-65%), HID run at a PF of around .98-1 (98-100%), so you have to adjust wattages to what is actually being drawn by the devices. With that in mind though, a watt between the two is a watt, and both will produce roughly the same heat per watt. The caveat to this, and the reason most people say they are cooler, is that the heat produced by a T5 is spread over the entire surface area of the bulb, and thus is more evenly dissipated. The heat from an HID is all produced in a very small area, and as such is a much more concentrated heat. T5's still get hot. If I get my plants closer than 2" or so from the bulbs they start to wilt, same if I get them closer than 4" and don't have an oscillating fan blowing across the bulbs. If I didn't have ventilation, the total heat in my closet would be the same between the HID or T5's assuming I matched wattages.