The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

sync0s

Well-Known Member
wow you guys are sexist too.. no i simply am pointing out that the fluctuations of population may have a hand in this all, as well as the demise of the us. i feel like something is going to happen, and very soon. everyone needs to be prepared and ready for anything. and simply pointing out that the governments we quickly demonize though have their problems, not necessarily the same due to preventative measures. i look forward to the day when everything collapses, and we're left to fend for ourselves, and i believe that day will be here much sooner than we think.
I don't understand how we're sexist?? I was legitimately confused as to your gender and hated calling you a he/she. Perhaps you would prefer 'it'? I don't know, up to you I guess.

Okay IT: The entire worlds land mass, excluding Antarctica, is 57,510,000 square miles with a population of 6.930,272,900 (2005) which puts the world wide density at 132 people per square mile. The city of Manila, Philippines is the most dense city in the world with 1,660,714 population and 14.88 square miles of area, putting their density at 111,576 people per square mile. I think we have plenty more room.....
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
and you have the right to refuse service into your grocery store based on the color of ones skin ( or the lack of color)
Government does not own your business. They have no right to tell you who you can or cannot serve. Government doesn't own it's citizens. Let society dictate that. Society at least gives people choices. Why rely on the same government that created Jim Crow laws?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
let me get this right. you're heads still up your backburner.
what does parker do when he has no valid argument to make? hurls insults.

government made those illegal laws you douchebag. If you had a lick of retention in history you'd know that.
local governments tried to keep those racist laws after the fed gov told them they couldn't.

who is the candidate that wants local governments to have more control over issues like this? rhymes with lon schmaul.

no one should profit from an illegal act. Newborns are under the jurisdiction of the country of their parents
see, there you go. ignoring what the constitution CLEARLY says. you only give a rat's ass about that thing when it suits your tilt.

wrong again
social programs, charity, is not the job of government
read the Constitution
the same one that you ignore whenever convenient.

let me just grab my pocket copy here: WE THE PEOPLE of the united states, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the united states of america.

seems to me that falls under "insuring domestic tranquility" and "promoting the general welfare".

Only an uninformed douchebag like you would continue printing lies. Ron Paul has never said people who pay into it wont get the coverage promised to them you asshat. He said allow people to opt out. If you don't know what the issues are STFU.
yeah, you should go find one of the many other ron paul threads, or start the 847th one if you want to talk about ron paul's views.

if you would be a darling and follow along, it is the point of view of the other poster malignant that it is wrong for the baby boomer's to be taking what they paid in.

try to follow along.

no you rarely get things right. Only an idiot would listen to a buffoon like you that gets so many things wrong. Better hope government continues to give handouts cause as dumb as you are, you're gonna need all the government assistance you can get.
more insults. i'm so hurt by your lame, weak attempts at harassment.

i do want government assistance programs to continue, even though i don't need them. why? because i have a thing called 'empathy' and give a rat's ass about others.

why is it you were born a liar, and have gotten worse? Did someone on planet retard tell you it was clever? Guess what, they lied.
planet retard?

the 80's called. it wants its lame jokes back.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
...you're heads still up your backburner.
actually, it is spelled "your head is still up your back burner". notice how i was able to manage a third grade level of grammar there by using the proper form of "you're/your"? and by also adding the verb "is" after "head"? and by spacing "back" and "burner"?

you may not want to make three mistakes that a third grader could avoid when trying to insult someone :lol:

...you douchebag....too bad your family didnt practice this...uninformed douchebag...you asshat. ...STFU... idiot...buffoon ...dumb...you were born a liar... planet retard...
what smells like bengay?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
The truth about Ron Paul is that he is wasting all the people who are supporting him time and energy...To run in a party that knowingly will not give you the nod, ignores you, and treats you like a red headed step child is dumb. Hell Bachmann has a better chance to win the nod then Ron and we all know thats some crazy shit...
 

budlover13

King Tut
The truth about Ron Paul is that he is wasting all the people who are supporting him time and energy...To run in a party that knowingly will not give you the nod, ignores you, and treats you like a red headed step child is dumb. Hell Bachmann has a better chance to win the nod then Ron and we all know thats some crazy shit...
Maybe he's a little desperate to save our Constitution after 30+ years of trying to beat them from the fringe.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ok say what you need to say...but myself would never invest peoples money and time in a losing cause when I could take that same money and time and have my own platform to speak which would gather more attention to myself...people tired of both parties but yet he stays with them..WTF ..if not now when ?????
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
ok say what you need to say...but myself would never invest peoples money and time in a losing cause when I could take that same money and time and have my own platform to speak which would gather more attention to myself...people tired of both parties but yet he stays with them..WTF ..if not now when ?????
Ron Paul is a winning cause-every time someone opens their mind to reality we are all winning.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
ok say what you need to say...but myself would never invest peoples money and time in a losing cause when I could take that same money and time and have my own platform to speak which would gather more attention to myself...people tired of both parties but yet he stays with them..WTF ..if not now when ?????
That's because you are weak? Not trying to insult you or anything, but someone who is strong will fight the powers that be and not back down. I'd rather piss my money away funding somebody who means something and doesn't give up than live in a world where everyone just followed the flow and avoided the uphill battles.

Give the Christians credit: it's a David and Goliath. I like underdogs.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
That's because you are weak? Not trying to insult you or anything, but someone who is strong will fight the powers that be and not back down. I'd rather piss my money away funding somebody who means something and doesn't give up than live in a world where everyone just followed the flow and avoided the uphill battles.

Give the Christians credit: it's a David and Goliath. I like underdogs.
excuse me...it would take a stronger man to stand on his own then to keep with the BS of others...I suggest you go and read my post again and you will see thats exactly what I'm telling Ron Paul to do ...Start his own fucking party...now thats a strong man with a movement...staying with these Repukes when you know they don't respect you nor will give you an honest shot at the nod is weak and stupid...
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
excuse me...it would take a stronger man to stand on his own then to keep with the BS of others...I suggest you go and read my post again and you will see thats exactly what I'm telling Ron Paul to do ...Start his own fucking party...now thats a strong man with a movement...staying with these Repukes when you know they don't respect you nor will give you an honest shot at the nod is weak and stupid...
You are wrong-and Paul did start his own partys- Libratarian and tea
he is running repub so he has a chance of being president and a chance to try and save our countries future.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
excuse me...it would take a stronger man to stand on his own then to keep with the BS of others...I suggest you go and read my post again and you will see thats exactly what I'm telling Ron Paul to do ...Start his own fucking party...now thats a strong man with a movement...staying with these Repukes when you know they don't respect you nor will give you an honest shot at the nod is weak and stupid...
Actually, in the view of marketing himself and his ideas, it's not so stupid. You know how much money the libertarians have to raise just to get their names on ballots? How about how hard it is to participate in debates, or get on the news? He's using the Republican party as a grounds for marketing himself, and if he loses the nomination he will hopefully run independent again.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Actually, in the view of marketing himself and his ideas, it's not so stupid. You know how much money the libertarians have to raise just to get their names on ballots? How about how hard it is to participate in debates, or get on the news? He's using the Republican party as a grounds for marketing himself, and if he loses the nomination he will hopefully run independent again.
I'm sorry for some reason I thought Ron Paul was a movement that A LOT of people would get behind...I didn't realize that he would not be able to raise enough money and ignite that Libertarian Party like he did in 1988..I hope you do realize that the Libertarian Party did have a candidate on the ballot for the 2008 elections ( not 50 states for that was only done in 1980, 1992, 1996, and 2000 but as we see it can be done)...and please understand it will not be IF he loses the Repuke nomination but when...Ron Paul can't even seem to keep his Tea Party Movement..He let the likes of Michele Bachmann steal it away from him..now he just seems like a tired old man begging to be heard..going on any show even if it makes a fool out of him...Ron Paul needs to realize that the Republican party has never forgot how he back stabbed them in 1988 and will never let him get that nod...again a true movement would raise on its own and become something more then what he is now...but instead Ron Paul seems to be fading away....
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry for some reason I thought Ron Paul was a movement that A LOT of people would get behind...I didn't realize that he would not be able to raise enough money and ignite that Libertarian Party like he did in 1988..I hope you do realize that the Libertarian Party did have a candidate on the ballot for the 2008 elections ( not 50 states for that was only done in 1980, 1992, 1996, and 2000 but as we see it can be done)...and please understand it will not be IF he loses the nomination but when...Ron Paul can't even seem to keep his Tea Party Movement..He let the likes of Michele Bachmann steal it away from him..now he just seems like a tired old man begging to be heard..going on any show even if it makes a fool out of him...Ron Paul needs to realize that the Republican party has never forgot how he back stabbed them in 1988 and well never let him get that nod...again a true movement would raise on its own and become something more then what he is now...but instead Ron Paul seems to be fading away....
excellent post!

ron paul ran as an independent last year, he got about 0.00032% of the vote.:lol:

the libertarian, bob barr, got about .00398% of the vote :lol:

ross perot got over 18% of the vote running as an independent in 1992 :shock:

ron paul is fading away......
 

Carthoris

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry for some reason I thought Ron Paul was a movement that A LOT of people would get behind...I didn't realize that he would not be able to raise enough money and ignite that Libertarian Party like he did in 1988..I hope you do realize that the Libertarian Party did have a candidate on the ballot for the 2008 elections ( not 50 states for that was only done in 1980, 1992, 1996, and 2000 but as we see it can be done)...and please understand it will not be IF he loses the Repuke nomination but when...Ron Paul can't even seem to keep his Tea Party Movement..He let the likes of Michele Bachmann steal it away from him..now he just seems like a tired old man begging to be heard..going on any show even if it makes a fool out of him...Ron Paul needs to realize that the Republican party has never forgot how he back stabbed them in 1988 and will never let him get that nod...again a true movement would raise on its own and become something more then what he is now...but instead Ron Paul seems to be fading away....
The Republican party is changing the game plan towards Libertarian ideas. This is a big part of Ron Paul's goals. I honestly don't think he even wants to be POTUS, why would anyone? It is a shit job, low pay(he'd make as much as a doctor), half the country is going to hate you even if you walk on water. He wants to fix the problems and that's why he is in the Republican party now. Whether Ron Paul becomes POTUS or not doesn't matter. What does matter is that he turns a portion of American's towards freedom and responsibility. He is doing that and will leave his mark on politics. Ron Paul is a man of conviction who is will to stand up for his beliefs even if it doesn't help his political career. Have you ever seen anyone in in our government go and say they have no respect for him? His son doesn't excite me like Ron Paul does, but he is his son, and his fathers words have to be rolling around in there somewhere. He will be around for the next 20-30 years. Maybe he will be the new Ron Paul. You know, the only one in the entire place who votes based on his beliefs and votes the same on the same issue every time he votes. That is probably wishful thinking though.
 

tryingtogrow89

Well-Known Member
excellent post!

ron paul ran as an independent last year, he got about 0.00032% of the vote.:lol:

the libertarian, bob barr, got about .00398% of the vote :lol:

ross perot got over 18% of the vote running as an independent in 1992 :shock:

ron paul is fading away......
Ha you will laugh when i tell you this story.
Last election i voted for Ralph Nader, because i didn't like any of the other candidates, i did not know anything about Ron Paul whatsoever (allot of people didn't).
He had gone completely unrecognized by me. I found out about Dr.paul not to long after Barry became president elect, i know 100% Ron Paul has my vote and the rest of my family/friends vote. = 250+ people that i personally know very well, are voting for the man, most of which did not even vote at all last election, because of the sour candidates, an even smaller percentage actually voted for McCain and Soetoro. There is that big of a difference this time around in Dr.pauls favor. Still a year and a half away from the 2012 election the only people i see driving around with 2012 campaign bumper stickers are those that state (ron paul 2012).
The difference between last election and this, is he is the true front runner for the republican party. It is quite evident, he ran this time after contemplating even running in the first place, because he saw how the country is massively learning about who Paul is and they are demanding him.
So please explain what this "Ron Paul is fading away" mumbo jumbo is?
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry for some reason I thought Ron Paul was a movement that A LOT of people would get behind...I didn't realize that he would not be able to raise enough money and ignite that Libertarian Party like he did in 1988..I hope you do realize that the Libertarian Party did have a candidate on the ballot for the 2008 elections ( not 50 states for that was only done in 1980, 1992, 1996, and 2000 but as we see it can be done)...and please understand it will not be IF he loses the Repuke nomination but when...Ron Paul can't even seem to keep his Tea Party Movement..He let the likes of Michele Bachmann steal it away from him..now he just seems like a tired old man begging to be heard..going on any show even if it makes a fool out of him...Ron Paul needs to realize that the Republican party has never forgot how he back stabbed them in 1988 and will never let him get that nod...again a true movement would raise on its own and become something more then what he is now...but instead Ron Paul seems to be fading away....
I did realize, I voted for him. Clever using the size on the words fading away. ;)
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
you voted for Bob Barr ?????
I know, I know. Showing support for the libertarians, I didn't like the other candidates and I don't believe in not voting. I didn't know about Ron Paul at the time. I actually didn't know much about Barr, but I liked Root (his running mate).

I am shamed.
 
Top