The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

tryingtogrow89 said:

Yep, dumped his bloody corpse at sea immediately, honestly i said it to my self i said. I believe that recent story of his death and the forever changing facts, data, and inconsistencies.
Then i shook my head and though WTF? that sounds absolutely insane! you honestly cant sit back and accept that story if you have a brain, come on.

Click to expand...

yeah, forget about the tangible evidence of the raid, the testimony from his family, the reports from the locals, and the fact that you are calling our most elite soldiers a pack of liars.

all that matters is the theory you cooked up in that noggin of yours.

no response to the good job he did in expanding my wife's ability to get health insurance? or gays being able to serve their country? or women being able to combat pay discrimination? is it all just about your conspiracy?

New segment from the CNN interview I missed: [video=youtube;BgQB60-MT3Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgQB60-MT3Q[/video]

Ron Paul: "I Can Win in 201"


"I never thought id get elected to congress"

"Main stream is now talking about all the things I have been talking about for a long time and therefore, nobody knows what the outcome of this election will be"

"whos saying bring the troops home, who believes in sound money"

"They are sick of the status quo" (the american people)

I heard that Ron Paul had sex with a turtle.

Arguing that anti-trust laws are harmful to our country is ludicrous. Deprave, where did you study economics?

University of Michigan, Community College, High School...The internet.... how about yourself? Microsoft School of keynes?

Oh is it ludicrous, explain yourself ....We don't have any monopolies or fraud? the big corporations don't have an advantage? Regulations don't give them that advatage? please explain without using a pie char ot government statistics *sends a text message on his sprintrizon*after typing this message on his microsoft pc with a Korean monitor*


anyway


all that is beside the point




In a free market monopolies are an IMPOSSIBILITY (YES IMPOSSIBLE) *sips his cokepepsi from wal-mart*

Why? Because a monopoly by definition..corners the market and controls the prices...Again, Impossible in a Free Market..

Girdweed said:

I heard that Ron Paul had sex with a turtle.

Click to expand...

i've said for a long time that i like turtles.

apparently, ron paul REALLY likes turtles.

UncleBuck said:

yeah, forget about the tangible evidence of the raid, the testimony from his family, the reports from the locals, and the fact that you are calling our most elite soldiers a pack of liars.

all that matters is the theory you cooked up in that noggin of yours.

no response to the good job he did in expanding my wife's ability to get health insurance? or gays being able to serve their country? or women being able to combat pay discrimination? is it all just about your conspiracy?

Click to expand...

First of all, in that noggin of yours, did it ever occur that things like gays shouldn't be a presidential matter? and more a personal private matter? and isnt ones health a private manner?
Rather than the huge lobbyists, and corporation of pharmaceutical developments, becoming corrupted and money hungry globalists? Therefore will tell your wife she is denied for "A preexisting condition" therefore more money in their pockets? how do you not know this i refuse to believe that you think these are presidential matters. and then when barry (god like) sotaro, jumps up at the podium, and gives his powerful, insightful, deceitful, speeches of his reform to change these things back to how they fucking should have been if we all kept our selves constitutional in the first fucking place. Then everyone cheers, and parades around like he is the savoir. When you know geo political, and you study research, breath, eat, and sleep it. Then this is what we would call the totalitarian, Problem, Reaction, Solution. Hey you know what? if you don't know it research it! Debunked once again.

I did my undergrad work at UF, then Leeds School of Business @ CU for Master's.

Of course there are monopolies. Your local power company is a regulated monopoly.

Market power is the driving force behind Antitrust Laws. Corporations have several? advantages with access to capital being one of the most relevant. Care to explain how Antitrust laws are bad for the consumer? I'm always willing to learn something new.

On another topic, how do you feel about corporations being given rights similar to the rights of citizens

deprave said:

In a free market monopolies are an IMPOSSIBILITY (YES IMPOSSIBLE)

Click to expand...

Saying something not true in large print does not make it more true.

When you remove all the regulations that stop corporations from buying up all their competition, there will be more monopolies.

I understand your train of thought. You think that if there is a free market, someone can start a new corporation and compete in a market. But that's not how it works in reality. In reality when a monopoly faces competition they will just temporarily lower their prices in the area where there is a competitor even to the point of operating at a loss until the competition goes out of business, then they raise their prices again. Or they just buy up any serious competition. The result is the same, the monopoly stays in tact. That's why we have anti-trust laws.

tryingtogrow89 said:

First of all, in that noggin of yours, did it ever occur that things like gays shouldn't be a presidential matter? and more a personal private matter? and isnt ones health a private manner?

Click to expand...

no. discrimination against gays is not a private matter. just like barring blacks from supposedly 'public' establishments is not a private matter. these are one of the few areas where i want a strong central government to step in and say "you can't do that".

and health is a private matter, for the most part. when people who could afford insurance but opt to not get it then have to visit an ER and leave the rest of us to foot the bill, i want a strong central government to step in and say "you can't do that". if everyone is in the pool, the costs go down. take a look at every other nation that pays half what we do yet insure all their citizens.

Dan Kone said:

I understand your train of thought. You think that if there is a free market, someone can start a new corporation and compete in a market. But that's not how it works in reality.

Click to expand...

i believe those are called 'barriers to entry' in economic speak.

I gotta go to bed and get up for work in 5 hours, ill talk more about this tomorrow:

Anti-trust laws can be very good in my view.


Dr Paul opposes them at the federal level; he feels they are unconstitutional. Dr Paul approved of them at a state level, like a lot of issues Dr Paul is for states rights.
Big corporations favor a highly regulated system, because it keeps competition from entering the market.

In a truly free market, anti-trust laws are however, completely unnecessary, as monopolies are an impossibility.

deprave said:

I gotta go to bed and get up for work in 5 hours, ill talk more about this tomorrow:

Anti-trust laws can be very good in my view.


Dr Paul opposes them at the federal level; he feels they are unconstitutional. Dr Paul approved of them at a state level, like a lot of issues Dr Paul is for states rights.
Big corporations favor a highly regulated system, because it keeps competition from entering the market.

In a truly free market, anti-trust laws are however, completely unnecessary.

Click to expand...

I have to go to bed too. All in a days work.

And yes dan because I make it big and bold letts it makes it true lol...<---damn near almost put that in parenthesis after the big bold letters but you beat me to it

So, we agree that a truly free market is a pipe dream.

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3....

Saying that the Federal government can not regulate trade is not a valid argument considering the above part of the Constitution. The "Commerce Clause" limits states' ability to regulate antitrust. Ron Paul's idea would require 2/3 of the House and Senate and 3/4 of the states to support his idea.

Honestly, that's a pipe dream.

It would require a lot more than that to fully implement his free market philosophy for America and he's well aware of that, little steps along the way can bring us closer to sound money however, his audit of the federal reserve is just one revolutionary step in the right direction, he has done more then anyone else has done and plans to do more then anyone else plans to. Whats Mitt Romney's Plan ....Cut the deficit by spending less? lol ..Obama...Cut the deficit by spending more? .......has that worked? How many books have they wrote on economics?

Ron Paul = Revolution

Everyone Else = Same old shit


How many more times are you going to buy into the same old crap.....Windmills, Cut the deficit, spread democracy, fucking wind millls.....fuck that legalize hemp/marijuana.....bring the troops home for real this time...do something different with the economy, ANYTHING! again fukin wind mills ... (lol joking about the wind mills, not really)

deprave said:

... his audit of the federal reserve is just one revolutionary step in the right direction...

Click to expand...

didn't the senate vote 96 to 0 to audit the fed?

it seems like no one we have elected does not support this.

UncleBuck said:

didn't the senate vote 96 to 0 to audit the fed?

it seems like no one we have elected does not support this.

Click to expand...

Wasn't it his idea? isn't he the one doing it? Yes ofcourse everyone supported it, its brilliant. Ron Paul also predicted the housing bubble and financial collapse 5 years in advance. Obama can't even pick the NCAA final four. Romney can't even pick a position on abortion.

im pritty sure this guy has ties to the clan im not sure but rumor has it when he was younger he was associated but im assuming denounced because there hasn't been a political kkk figure since duke but regrdless just saying
i think hes a little fruity like juicy fruit fruity but still im just saying

NAACP seems ok with him from what i've read. Doesn't really make a lot of sense to me had he been proven racist.

bilderberg meeting june 13th, they start meeting up on Thursday the ninth though.
But don't worry, its only a conspiracy theory.