They finally obtained a Trump Tax Return!

PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Implicit or implied consent exists....i send you notice and you dont respond in 30 days, implied consent to notice.

Implied legal contracts, not so much.
I agree with your latter sentiment though.
Click to expand...
The term might not fit but the idea of being obligated to reciprocate compensation or service seems to fit well. It is the most pragmatic solution.
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
This tax release was well chosen to be leaked. Show me a leak with all the forms and more recent, then we have something. Right now we have a Distraction with the info of knowing now to watch out for him trying to rid of the ATM
Click to expand...
you wont repeat yourself over and over and over and over and over....
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
cool2burn said:
Another idiot who has no idea. PTSD look it up dummy or maybe you would prefer I injure or kill someone that pisses me off? I do not work not because I do not want to. It is because my phycologist has told me I can not. That is why I am trying to start my own little cannabis farm I can do by myself. Not having to deal with ignorant dummies like you everyday. Just a processor every 3 months for a bit. In fact my PTSD has gotten so bad my spouse actually gets a caregiver allowance for me. Dumb liberal tool.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your service, best wishes to you sir
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
a senile fungus said:
What a delicate snowflake, so fragile, that must be sheltered in his safe space so as not to melt.

I'm sure you're grateful for the welfare benefits you recieve, you seemingly couldn't function without them.
Click to expand...
lol. dude, you couldnt be more wrong. i dare you to say that to any veterans face, most wouldnt react very positively towards you. the nice ones will let you walk away, in what condition is the question. so, who's the real snowflake here?
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
I believe certain things, certainly common goods, belong in the public domain. The only way to be egalitarian towards common goods is to have everyone pitch in, or ideally a progressive system based on what people are able to contribute without being an unreasonable burden.
Click to expand...
so, this system works only if 100% of the population work within it? what society has 100% participation in anything? or, how much of the population would need to operate this way for it be sustaining, in your opinion? currently, approx 60% of the population in the US is employed, just for reference
 
visajoe1

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Those "stupid liberals" you hate so much are the ones fighting for the right of all Americans to live with dignity.
Click to expand...
Completely false. They (the loud, boisterous, protesting Dem's) "fight" for the victims and small pockets of human variation that unfortunately dont move the needle for society much at the end of the day. Ironically, their answers to these "injustices" and or "microaggressions" is to remove (discriminate??) opposing ideals, which apparently is only innate within every white man. Somehow, its supposed to be enlightening to ignore and demonize the majority of the population? Interesting concept
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
i married into money which we never touch.

you're perfectly capable of working but mooch off the government instead. and then you complain about the workforce participation rate.

fucking pathetic beyond description.
Click to expand...
Yet you have no capacity for capital for whatever reason<meff>. Proof is you admit to paying PMI insurance on your median mortgage.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Yet you have no capacity for capital for whatever reason<meff>. Proof is you admit to paying PMI insurance on your median mortgage.
Click to expand...
again, people who dwell in mobile homes and sort pennies need not weigh in on how a smart man handles his financial affairs.

i am not the one who needs a special teller every time i go into the bank.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
If you were king for a day, could you construct a law that would eliminate hypocrites forever?
Click to expand...
Why don't you just directly state your point instead of responding with cryptic questions? My argument is pragmatic not idealistic. It won't be perfect but it is the better, most efficient, utilitarian solution.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
lol. dude, you couldnt be more wrong. i dare you to say that to any veterans face, most wouldnt react very positively towards you. the nice ones will let you walk away, in what condition is the question. so, who's the real snowflake here?
Click to expand...
He's not saying it to "any" or "every" veteran, just the one that didn't do shit for me or anyone else in the USA and now feels entitled to have us pay for his bad decision the rest of his life.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
Why don't you just directly state your point instead of responding with cryptic questions? My argument is pragmatic not idealistic. It won't be perfect but it is the better, most efficient, utilitarian solution.
Click to expand...
your argument is compulsory service and contribution.

PCXV said:
He's not saying it to "any" or "every" veteran, just the one that didn't do shit for me or anyone else in the USA and now feels entitled to have us pay for his bad decision the rest of his life.
Click to expand...
Well when volunteering for the military you don't enter an implied contract, its a written one. Its like being mad at your car payment.

This raises another question, is a volunteer soldier more efficient than a compelled one?
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
so, this system works only if 100% of the population work within it? what society has 100% participation in anything? or, how much of the population would need to operate this way for it be sustaining, in your opinion? currently, approx 60% of the population in the US is employed, just for reference
Click to expand...
Not nearly 100% is required. Remember, the issue is common goods. That doesn't require a perfect world, just a system that ensures those that use common goods are contributing in correlation to their ability to do so.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
visajoe1 said:
Completely false. They (the loud, boisterous, protesting Dem's) "fight" for the victims and small pockets of human variation that unfortunately dont move the needle for society much at the end of the day. Ironically, their answers to these "injustices" and or "microaggressions" is to remove (discriminate??) opposing ideals, which apparently is only innate within every white man. Somehow, its supposed to be enlightening to ignore and demonize the majority of the population? Interesting concept
Click to expand...
You're right, but only if you incluce both sides and exclude many members that disagree with the strategy and rhetoric of division.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
your argument is compulsory service and contribution.



Well when volunteering for the military you don't enter an implied contract, its a written one. Its like being mad at your car payment.

This raises another question, is a volunteer soldier more efficient than a compelled one?
Click to expand...
You are only compelled by reciprocity.

Yep, he signed the contract and now feels we should pay for him to live the rest of his life because his voluntary choices brought PTSD on him. Doesn't sound very libertarian to me.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
PCXV said:
You are only compelled by reciprocity.

Yep, he signed the contract and now feels we should pay for him to live the rest of his life because his voluntary choices brought PTSD on him. Doesn't sound very libertarian to me.
Click to expand...
You sign a contract every year to fund his contract. False?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top