This guy has a gun and wont show police an ID

budlover13 said:

Which is all the more reason to allow it. Still doesn't affect them performing their lawful and legal duties.

Click to expand...

I'm sure it's not the lawful and legal duty they are worried about. Gotta try and control the press so you can spin the outcome.

Grandpapy said:

I'm sure it's not the lawful and legal duty they are worried about. Gotta try and control the press so you can spin the outcome.

Click to expand...

Agreed. Which is why it should be allowed across the board. If a judge rules otherwise, he needs to pay a price for usurping our freedom imo.

canndo said:

don't watch SCOTUS much Doc?

Click to expand...

Yeah Yeah Yeah. the roberts court is full of evil nasty big government conservatives who want to curtail your freedom to have abortions and create secret undergound fight clubs with the ultimate goal of destroying the 3 credit reporting agencies and all the debt records.

meanwhile obama dreams of a supreme court filled with his cronies who believe that all things are commerce so the feds can regulate everything from cradle to grave, and america will achieve the purity of an ant colony. of course there will still havve to be "lawer infursmint offisers" to quell the food riots, and ensure that nobody hoards the soylent green.