This is what happens when politics go one sided

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
ban other's freedom of speech, because they feel "uncomfortable" hearing different opinions.
Click to expand...
The first amendment doesn't protect you from getting punched in the face when you offend people. It doesn't even give you the right to say anything you want anywhere. This is a privately owned website, not a junior high school cafeteria. Don't be such a snowflake about people not caring what you have to say.
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
Automated response:

Dear alt-left troll, please refrain from braking the below rules should you wish to partake in adult conversation.

alt-left
1) People, who ban other's freedom of speech, because they feel "uncomfortable" hearing different opinions.
2) People, who physically assault other individuals, and damage both public and private property in the name of "peace" and "love".
3) People, who care more about their selfish desires and arrogant views than about the country they live in.
Click to expand...
*breaking

Dumb redneck
 
Flowki

Flowki

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
The first amendment doesn't protect you from getting punched in the face when you offend people. It doesn't even give you the right to say anything you want anywhere. This is a privately owned website, not a junior high school cafeteria. Don't be such a snowflake about people not caring what you have to say.
Click to expand...
This is not about the American constitution. Even if it was, explore the idea that each individual amendment or law may or may not be correct. I don't hold any hope of you not using a self serving context on that to continue verbal abuse. But that's fine, it it shows you up to anybody with critical thinking. It's a private website, they can delete all this if they want. You can ignore me when ever you want too.. both are not happening just yet.

At-least for now, on the contrary people clearly care about what I have to say, including you for taking the time to type. The alt left is no less extreme than the alt-right, they camouflage the violence and intolerance of anything right of crazy alt-left (that includes some of the left and all of the middle and right) with a false righteousness that is thankfully diminishing. They are like the proverbial Dexter.. the alt-right are just plane old serial killers while the alt-left are serial killers who only kill bad people so it's ok. But because they are obviously mentally challenged people they change the rules on who ''bad people'' are. As you are American I am sure you can relate this. I seen a vid of an older guy completely alone getting beaten pretty bad by a few men who then stole his car, just because he was a trump supporter. Apparently that's ok, why?. Watch chucks response to this. He is the poster child for alt-left.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
I don't hold any hope of you not using a self serving context on that to continue verbal abuse.
Click to expand...
Well that's good because I plan to. Keep crying about freeze peach though, I appreciate the trollportunities. So what laws have actually been enacted to "ban your freedom of speech just because someone is uncomfortable"? I need full legal citations.
 
Flowki

Flowki

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
*breaking

Dumb redneck
Click to expand...
People who use grammar to disregard opinion or score points usually have the depth of a puddle. Taking into account the insult that followed, it's a certinty.
 
Last edited:
Flowki

Flowki

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Well that's good because I plan to. Keep crying about freeze peach though, I appreciate the trollportunities. So what laws have actually been enacted to "ban your freedom of speech just because someone is uncomfortable"? I need full legal citations.
Click to expand...
So more diversion of the main topics?, you've confirmed you have nothing of value on them to bring to the table thus hide under it. You have the right to troll, do as you please.
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
People who use grammar to disregard opinion or score points usually have the depth of a puddle. Taking into account the insult that followed, it's a certinty.
Click to expand...
It shows, with regard to debating you, that you are infra dig and contemptible. Your analysis of my post on - fake nostalgia being a petri dish for Neo Nazis, was that it was about food.
Fatty
 
Flowki

Flowki

Well-Known Member
zeddd said:
It shows, with regard to debating you, that you are infra dig and contemptible. Your analysis of my post on - fake nostalgia being a petri dish for Neo Nazis, was that it was about food.
Fatty
Click to expand...
I over estimated you. The depth of a tea spoon of water.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
This is not about the American constitution. Even if it was, explore the idea that each individual amendment or law may or may not be correct. I don't hold any hope of you not using a self serving context on that to continue verbal abuse. But that's fine, it it shows you up to anybody with critical thinking. It's a private website, they can delete all this if they want. You can ignore me when ever you want too.. both are not happening just yet.

At-least for now, on the contrary people clearly care about what I have to say, including you for taking the time to type. The alt left is no less extreme than the alt-right, they camouflage the violence and intolerance of anything right of crazy alt-left (that includes some of the left and all of the middle and right) with a false righteousness that is thankfully diminishing. They are like the proverbial Dexter.. the alt-right are just plane old serial killers while the alt-left are serial killers who only kill bad people so it's ok. But because they are obviously mentally challenged people they change the rules on who ''bad people'' are. As you are American I am sure you can relate this. I seen a vid of an older guy completely alone getting beaten pretty bad by a few men who then stole his car, just because he was a trump supporter. Apparently that's ok, why?. Watch chucks response to this. He is the poster child for alt-left.
Click to expand...
your unhinged meltdowns exemplify the type of intellectual retardation it takes to be a pants-shitting muslim-hating bigot
 
Flowki

Flowki

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
I asked you a question.
Click to expand...
So is this a chance to converse?.. lets see.

No laws that I know, the banning of freedom of speech is done by shutting down freedom of fact based opinion via social ridicule. It is a powerful tool and it stems from the top, they can hit you with controlling measures they could never set into actual law.

For example, trump is not exactly a stand up guy and many hate him. However, does that mean every thing he does is bad?.. has he never done or said anything good, ever?. The amount of ridicule you would get from subjective trump haters would make a positive affirmation on a single action.. no matter how objectively correct.. a no go for the cowardly socialite type. That trickles down to the impressionable and they bash that message home to anybody spineless enough to back bench case by case factual opinion to avoid any level of social ridicule.

If you don't appreciate the power of social ridicule think of why so many western women shave arm pits. It makes no sense what so ever as it's a complete inconvenience with no actual benefit. It isn't illegal for women to have hairy armpits, but they don't.

The unwritten laws of sociology in the depths of fact manipulation and false witch hunts is creating a political dictatorship. The left is responsible for it, ironically. If you want to dig deeper you could say the right pushed the left into this corner. But that's my point, the extreme of either end leads to no good. We have only really seen the extreme right in most country's. The extreme left has no real name (nazi etc etc) because it's still rising. History won't judge it any better.

Again I point to the hate filled fact luster idiocy that is chuck. He is what history will remember as the ''closet right'' alt-lefties. Hate is hate, no matter the color. Alt-left has so much hate.
 
Last edited:
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
So is this a chance to converse?.. lets see.

No laws that I know, the banning of freedom of speech is done by shutting down freedom of fact based opinion via social ridicule. It is a powerful tool and it stems from the top, they can hit you with controlling measures they could never set into actual law.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you won't mind if I excuse myself from enduring the nonsense with a tl;dr. So You can, in fact, say any racist bigoted little thing you wan to say, legal as ever. You believe that if it offends people, it is not because it is offensive or bigoted, but because there is a secret agreement by everyone who doesn't love Donald Trump to feign as though they were offended and to "hit you with controlling measures".

You poor persecuted little bigot, how dare people curb your freeze peach without actually curbing your freeze peach...

Have you considered suicide?
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
So is this a chance to converse?.. lets see.

No laws that I know, the banning of freedom of speech is done by shutting down freedom of fact based opinion via social ridicule. It is a powerful tool and it stems from the top, they can hit you with controlling measures they could never set into actual law.

For example, trump is not exactly a stand up guy and many hate him. However, does that mean every thing he does is bad?.. has he never done or said anything good, ever?. The amount of ridicule you would get from subjective trump haters would make a positive affirmation on a single action.. no matter how objectively correct.. a no go for the cowardly socialite type. That trickles down to the impressionable and they bash that message home to anybody spineless enough to back bench case by case factual opinion to avoid any level of social ridicule.

If you don't appreciate the power of social ridicule think of why so many western women shave arm pits. It makes no sense what so ever as it's a complete inconvenience with no actual benefit. It isn't illegal for women to have hairy armpits, but they don't.

The unwritten laws of sociology in the depths of fact manipulation and false witch hunts is creating a political dictatorship. The left is responsible for it, ironically. If you want to dig deeper you could say the right pushed the left into this corner. But that's my point, the extreme of either end leads to no good. We have only really seen the extreme right in most country's. The extreme left has no real name (nazi etc etc) because it's still rising. History won't judge it any better.

Again I point to the hate filled fact luster idiocy that is chuck. He is what history will remember as the ''closet right'' alt-lefties. Hate is hate, no matter the color. Alt-left has so much hate.
Click to expand...
Speaking of bias and one-sidedness.

By the way, there is no alt-left. And everything Trump does is, in fact, bad. He can’t even keep his lies straight, let alone his facts.

You’re an imbecile, you’re biased, and a proven brainwashed hypocrite. I can’t even take you seriously.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Trump is gone from office about 100 days a year, either playing golf, obsessing over twitter or junkets to Mar a Lago. What wannabe scheming would be tyrant takes that much time off?

Just saying he does some good things.
 
PCXV

PCXV

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
So is this a chance to converse?.. lets see.

No laws that I know, the banning of freedom of speech is done by shutting down freedom of fact based opinion via social ridicule. It is a powerful tool and it stems from the top, they can hit you with controlling measures they could never set into actual law.

For example, trump is not exactly a stand up guy and many hate him. However, does that mean every thing he does is bad?.. has he never done or said anything good, ever?. The amount of ridicule you would get from subjective trump haters would make a positive affirmation on a single action.. no matter how objectively correct.. a no go for the cowardly socialite type. That trickles down to the impressionable and they bash that message home to anybody spineless enough to back bench case by case factual opinion to avoid any level of social ridicule.

If you don't appreciate the power of social ridicule think of why so many western women shave arm pits. It makes no sense what so ever as it's a complete inconvenience with no actual benefit. It isn't illegal for women to have hairy armpits, but they don't.

The unwritten laws of sociology in the depths of fact manipulation and false witch hunts is creating a political dictatorship. The left is responsible for it, ironically. If you want to dig deeper you could say the right pushed the left into this corner. But that's my point, the extreme of either end leads to no good. We have only really seen the extreme right in most country's. The extreme left has no real name (nazi etc etc) because it's still rising. History won't judge it any better.

Again I point to the hate filled fact luster idiocy that is chuck. He is what history will remember as the ''closet right'' alt-lefties. Hate is hate, no matter the color. Alt-left has so much hate.
Click to expand...
Or maybe it is justifiable to ridicule ideas based in lies and prejudice? "Liberal" is a four letter word on Fox News, you want to talk about demonization and manufactured, feigned outrage? Look at dozens and dozens of lies and manufactured controversy about Obama that Breitbart, Fox, Limbaugh, Republicans etc. propogated. Trump deserves pretty much every ounce of criticism he has recieved. Republicans deserve more criticism than they recieve. The 1st amendment protects you from government censorship, but it doesn't shield you from criticism. I think the true problem is that many right-wing ideas don't stand up to scrutiny, and without a defense based in rationale, right-wingers cop out with victimhood arguments.
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
Flowki said:
So is this a chance to converse?.. lets see.

No laws that I know, the banning of freedom of speech is done by shutting down freedom of fact based opinion via social ridicule. It is a powerful tool and it stems from the top, they can hit you with controlling measures they could never set into actual law.

For example, trump is not exactly a stand up guy and many hate him. However, does that mean every thing he does is bad?.. has he never done or said anything good, ever?. The amount of ridicule you would get from subjective trump haters would make a positive affirmation on a single action.. no matter how objectively correct.. a no go for the cowardly socialite type. That trickles down to the impressionable and they bash that message home to anybody spineless enough to back bench case by case factual opinion to avoid any level of social ridicule.

If you don't appreciate the power of social ridicule think of why so many western women shave arm pits. It makes no sense what so ever as it's a complete inconvenience with no actual benefit. It isn't illegal for women to have hairy armpits, but they don't.

The unwritten laws of sociology in the depths of fact manipulation and false witch hunts is creating a political dictatorship. The left is responsible for it, ironically. If you want to dig deeper you could say the right pushed the left into this corner. But that's my point, the extreme of either end leads to no good. We have only really seen the extreme right in most country's. The extreme left has no real name (nazi etc etc) because it's still rising. History won't judge it any better.

Again I point to the hate filled fact luster idiocy that is chuck. He is what history will remember as the ''closet right'' alt-lefties. Hate is hate, no matter the color. Alt-left has so much hate.
Click to expand...
First sentence is a mess, the first paragraph makes no real sense, who are “they”?
Second paragraph is a lame attempt at reductio ad absurdum which in and of itself is contemptible.
The rest is poorly conceived and unconvincing.
Do you chew straw?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top