Defense explains the gun shot, not an attack, at least according to 100% of the witnesses anyway.
trayvan martin
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
Defense explains the gun shot, not an attack, at least according to 100% of the witnesses anyway.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he was defending himself from a mentally unbalanced, drug addled vigilante with a gun and a history of violence.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
That's called self defense, but only if you're the president's son.
No, what it shows is that he has NEVER been convicted of any violent crime and likes to get involved in the safety issues of his community.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
showing up outside your ex-fiancee's and refusing to leave until she lets you in and then slapping her and throwing her to the bed is a community safety issue?
lol. and i'm marie of romania.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Hey Marie, there is a picture of you over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_of_Romania. You don't look anything like I pictured you!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
when your DEA rat of a father comes back, i'm telling him you used his computer.
apparently school is out for the summer.
If he were convicted of that domestic violence, then he would have never been able to own a gun. Guess it didn't happen.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
except that he says it did.
although, to be fair, zimm does lie a lot and play victim. so it's hard to know when he is and is not telling the truth.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Considering the low quality of the testimony, I retain reasonable doubt about that. You could be right ... but also the other thing. cn
desert dude
Well-Known Member
I would advise against it. Dad has been known to have his way with Romanians.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
is his way failing?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Gotta go, Marie. Keep spinning those fantasies, you gotta keep hope alive.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i have a screwdriver and women's jewelry too.
there is no evidence at all that he ever burglarized a home. and even if he did, zimm would have known that how?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so is zimmerman lying again when he says he assaulted his ex-fiancee?
If he were convicted of that domestic violence, then he would have never been able to own a gun. Guess it didn't happen
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
still no proof that martin ever burglarized a home. i'm gonna go mow the lawn.
Similar threads
