trayvan martin
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
Attacking a person? I dunno, I think they have laws against that kind of thing.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
He was smoking crack, rapin bitches, and breaking into houses obviously
doc111
Well-Known Member
........you beat me to it!
desert dude
Well-Known Member
The physical evidence speaks for itself. Concrete is hard on the cranium.
He was smoking crack, rapin bitches, and breaking into houses obviously
Don't forget! He was BLACK!!!!!!!
chrishydro
Well-Known Member
Not sure what you mean unless you are refering to the bond hearing issues. ABC news, had they shown the unaltered version of the video orig this case would not be an issue. Without knowing the real evd, none of us do, if I was on Jury right now only one thing would matter to me. The cops know exactly the spot he was standing when he called and they told him to back off. The cops know exactly where his truck was parked, if the shooting happened between those two spots than he is inocent. If it happened past where they told him to stop I might give a thought to manslaughter but not Murder II.
One of the things being released tomorrow is the diagram of the crime scene. If they dont release on the diagram where he was when he was told to back off than you can bet the pros knows he was in fact headed back to the car. If Zim kept going it still is tough to convict on Murder II but they might reduce to manslaughter. I guess we wait for the evidence and the trial.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there is no evidence to suggest that martin, who ran away and hid, suddenly became enraged and attacked anyone.
there is a lot of evidence to believe that martin, who ran away and hid, was sought out by a mentally unstable, drug addled, vigilante with a history of violence and rightfully defended himself.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
so says the ZIM. Trayvon had every right to stand his ground. Zimmerman had no right to follow and try to detain him. Zimmerman has changed his story three times just trying to explain how he was jumped. Can't wait to see him on the stand.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
why do you assume the kid that ran away and hid was attacking rather than defending himself? who has the history of violence and getting himself too involved?
londonfog
Well-Known Member
agree ^^^^^
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the physical evidence is evidence that martin had to defend himself from a psycho who didn't want to let assholes get away.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
and concrete bashing would leave more then two cuts measuring 2 cm and 0.05 cm..I hope you know the metric system so you will understand how fucking small those cuts are. good luck with that
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
anyone who is familiar with the case already knows what the diagram of the crime scene is like, zimmerman was behind the houses supposedly returning to his truck and looking for an address where there are no addresses and not on a path towards his truck.
Yeah, its ok to hurt someone just a little bit, but we draw the line at hurting someone really really bad don't we London?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Good luck with "the concrete wasn't hard enough" as a prosecution strategy.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
good luck with the "i got out of my truck and followed him because i was in fear" strategy, to be used jointly with the "i was looking for addresses behind the houses" strategy and the "i know the address of the clubhouse but not the street, one of three in my neighborhood, that is 100 yards away" strategy as well as the "he saw my concealed weapon with the x-ray eyeballs in the back of his head" strategy.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
How did Serino describe Z's injuries, "marginally life threatening", I think. That's the cop who investigated the case stating that Z's injuries were life threatening. Hard to walk that statement back.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
serino was playing zimm like a banjo telling him everything he wanted to hear. that's how you get information, you try to make it seem like you're on their side. serino isn't on trial here, they guy with the history of violence who stalked the innocent kid and shot him to death is.
Marginally only means slightly, and as Londonbridge so succinctly stated: " It only matters if a artery was cut or the dude was almost dead, that s the only time your allowed to use self defense against a brother." or something like that.
Similar threads
