UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
If he had turned to return to his truck as he states, he satisfied that condition. I still disagree with the assumption he was the aggressor, following him to ask him his business is far from aggressive, not to mention perfectly legal. I will concede there are many scenarios that would lead to his conviction, but as the sole survivor and the PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, his story is going to be hard to overcome. And the prosecution is off to an awful start if they don't have some bombshell evidence we don't know about.
you can personally disagree with the term "aggressor", but in the letter of the law that is exactly what he is. it doesn't necessarily mean he was aggressive, it just means he initiated, which he clearly did by profiling and then following martin, by his own admission on recorded tape.