Consensus*
It's true that there is a near consensus on the theory of anthropogenic climate change. 97% of peer-reviewed studies conclude in agreement with ACC. The other 3 percent were not conclusive.
So I will take this as an answer that you can not produce even a single citation of a peer-reviewed study which contradicts ACC. now that you have answered my question, I will answer your question about 911.
You asked me what I believe about 9-11. My answer is that I don't care. Everyone saw those planes strike the towers, I don't have to question why the towers fell. Clearly the steel beams melted and people were terrorized by the terrorism.
We can make this a 9-11 conspiracy therad now that you have conceded the climate change debate.
You must know, because you can string a coherant sentence together, that the 97% is a complete fallacy?
The methodology used in that study is so far beyond rational that it isn't even worth recognising.
Now, is the climate changing?
Yes.
Are we as humans accelerating the change?
I personally think yes, we are.
But by what degree?
No one can answer this question and if they can't, then I refuse to join the climate change cult.