Trump to get Impeachment Inquiry from Pelosi

Do you support the impeachment inquiry?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 71.4%

  • No

    Votes: 8 28.6%
  • Total voters
    28
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
At 5pm it is Pelosi told a reporter she was going to announce a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump. If nothing else this will open up the final play Trump gets to see if he can somehow wiggle out of this one.

I wonder what the reasons will be:
-Throwing children into detention centers
-Stopping the whistle blower
-Obstructing justice with Lewendowski hearing
-10 counts of Obstruction Mueller pointed out
-Sending his criminal lawyer to a foreign country to get dirt
-Offering pardons to people that break the law on the border
-Offering pardons to people that break the law while building the wall
-Using tax payers money to pump up his hotel in Ireland
-Using tax payers money to pump up his hotels in America
-Firing Jim Comey over "russia thing"
....my brain just shut down and refuses to let me type anymore.

 
TacoMac

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
It's actually over two things at this moment:
  1. The Ukraine phone call / withholding aide debacle.
  2. Blocking the whistleblower report.
 
Bugeye

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower’s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration’s determination that the complaint didn’t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.

LMAO, seen this movie before!
 
Unclebaldrick

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower’s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration’s determination that the complaint didn’t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.

Drank this Kool-Aid before!
Click to expand...
FIFY.

 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Bugeye said:
The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower’s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration’s determination that the complaint didn’t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.

LMAO, seen this movie before!
Click to expand...
Maybe this was a Trump troll on congress for sure. It wouldn't be surprising. But what this does is end the legal obstruction by Trump. Now it forces him to suck it up and deal with having everything come out and all his little minions continue to break the law with no 'executive privilege' and hope for pardons IF Trump can get re-elected.

I haven't seen this one before, it should be interesting.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
gonnagro said:
Voted "no" only because I haven't seen the transcript of the call. Also find it interesting he wants the transcript released, not his usual response. Trump is not known for transparency.
Click to expand...
This White House is already known for releasing falsified transcripts

Blocking the release of the whistleblower report is illegal

No one disagrees on the facts here, not even conald.

Conald used congressionally approved, taxpayer money to extort a foreign government into smearing his political opponent. That is not in doubt

Bugeye is crying right now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top