Did you realize these guys actually have NUCLEAR POWER as an energy production option for 'mid term consideration', meaning 20-50 years from now- and fuel cells simply weren't on the chart at all?
I heard exactly no one miss their chance to tell the power company to take nuclear power off the table as an option, full stop. That's nice and all, but to make sure they don't start scheming about doing it anyway, ("No emissions! Better nuclear power options are coming out all the time! Every technology has problems..." ) I want to be there ready to rock and roll with a viable, practical, cost effective and fuel flexible solution that makes nuclear impossibly expensive, and therefore unattractive.
I went several steps further and not only fleshed out the fuel cell option, but made a point of placing that fuel cell in the customer's own home, so they can take advantage of the benefits of cogeneration right where they live. I then challenged them to advocate for the right of consumers to actually contribute whatever excess electricity they've generated back to the grid at a reasonable market price.
Currently, their wholesale cost of power is about 70% of retail price on average. Peak load power generation is many times more expensive than that. They generate electricity at about 35% efficiency, and since these are plants at remote sites, the heat is simply dumped. The only reason that's affordable is because the price of coal has been locked in by long term contracts- and those are set to rise drastically in the next few years, as these contracts come up for renewal and begin to reflect current market realities.
One of the most exciting technologies coming online from the power company's perspective is a 'combined cycle' natural gas fired power plant, where the heat from the glorified jet turbine engine spinning the generator is also captured and utilized to generate additional power, bringing total efficiency up to the 60% neighborhood. Since the cost of natural gas is roughly ten times that of coal, this doesn't exactly reduce the price of generated power overall, even if it does look REALLY good as a low producer of CO² per megawatt.
Fuel cells already generate electricity at 40-65% efficiency, handily beating the power company at its own game- even before the benefits of cogenerated heat are factored in. That pushes total efficiency towards 90%, territory nothing in the power company's inventory can touch. The best part is that fuel cells actually work best and longest when they're run flat out, 100% constantly, like the little base load power generators they are. When the homeowner doesn't use all the power, s/he should be able to sell the excess back to the grid for someone else to use. This creates huge incentives for the kind of distributed power network we've been hearing about for years- but never seem to see progress in actually getting built.
I told y'all at the very beginning of this thread that it was going to be heavy on geek and light on glamour shots. The simple fact of the matter is that cannabis has become a looking glass, through which we can see the future of everything we do as a species. Few fields of human endeavor are immune from the influence of this industry, or its needs.