UK Govt: handling of medicinal cannabis review is called 'cruel'

vostok

Well-Known Member

The government's being "cruel" and "flawed" in its handing of a review of medicinal cannabis.

That's what an MP looking into drug policy reform has told Newsbeat.

The government was forced to look at the law after the case of Billy Caldwell -


whose mother fought for him to be able to use cannabis oil for his epilepsy.

The Home Office says patients will get "the most appropriate medical treatment as swiftly as possible".

It is currently reviewing the drug and in the meantime has set up an expert panel to look at individual cases.

However, campaigners say tens of thousands of people won't meet

the criteria of the panel and will still be forced to buy the drug illegally.


There are also fears the new expert panel won't be able to cope with the number of people coming forward.

The issue was raised by Vice Chair of The All Party Parliamentary Group

for Drug Policy Reform, Ronnie Cowan.

The SNP MP told Newsbeat the way things are being handled is "cruel and callous"

and says the only way forward is to allow GPs to prescribe cannabis based medicines.

"Put yourself in the situation that you have a family member who you believe can benefit from medical

cannabis, and they say that it will be available if you go in front of the panel then you are going to be there."


Ronnie Cowan wants a change to the government's policy

The United Patients Alliance (UPA), a group set up to change the law on medicinal cannabis,

says the current system is forcing people to become criminals.

Alex Fraser, who campaigns for the UPA, was diagnosed with Crohn's disease ten years ago.

He's tried a range of medication to control his condition but says vaping cannabis helps him the most.

"I've had crippling pain which has left me bed bound and unable to work. Cannabis

helps my pain, it helps me eat and sleep with very minimal side effects."


He wants to be seen by the government's expert panel, but doesn't think he will meet the criteria.

"The process they have set up is convoluted and complicated for ill people to navigate.

It's incredibly frustrating.

"I don't think I will meet the criteria and I don't think I will be seen," he told Newsbeat.

Cannabis: The facts

  • Cannabis is a Class B drug - it's illegal to possess, give away or sell
  • Possession is illegal whatever you're using it for, including pain relief
  • The penalty for possession is up to five years in prison
  • Supplying can get you up to 14 years and an unlimited fine
  • Giving it to friends, even if they don't pay, is considered as supplying
Alex's local MP, the Green Party's Caroline Lucas, is also a vice chair of

The All Party Parliamentary Group for Drug Policy Reform.

She says "the system being put in place is flawed but it's a step in the right direction".

Not everyone is critical of the way this has been handled. The co-chair of newly formed All Party

Parliamentary Group on Medicinal Cannabis, Mike Penning, says the past few weeks have

seen a big change in attitude.

"It can't be cruel if people like Billy Caldwell are getting the drugs their consultants say they need.

"I think we are a million miles forward than we have been with any government of any persuasion."


Billy Caldwell's mother, Charlotte, is worried that other families in her situation

won't have the success she's had.

The Home Office declined Newsbeat's request for an interview and sent us a statement.

"The expert panel of clinicians will advise ministers on applications from senior clinicians to prescribe

cannabis-related medicinal products in any exceptional cases and conditions

where there is an unmet clinical need.

"We are confident that this will ensure advice to ministers on licensing in these cases

is clinically led, based firmly upon medical evidence and that patients and their families

have access to the most appropriate course of medical treatment as swiftly as possible."

(Medicinal cannabis review called 'cruel')
 

Fubard

Well-Known Member
As posted elsewhere, the situation has already changed compared the start if the month, and that report was quick to point out the Billy Caldwell case but neglected to say how he was almost immediately given the necessary legal exemption to allow him to have his drug.

The situation is in flux, but you also have to be aware that the political bias seen in the UK media makes the US news look 100% neutral and, well, the BBC is one of the worst for twisting things to suit their own agenda and that should be remembered.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
As ever, the notion that people can be imprisoned for long periods for the possession and use of a harmless plant puts the lie to any ideas of 'Justice'.
 

ANC

Well-Known Member
"The expert panel of clinicians will advise ministers on applications from senior clinicians to prescribe

cannabis-related medicinal products in any exceptional cases and conditions

where there is an unmet clinical need.
Just ask Dr Nutt, if they don;t like what the specialists say, they just fire them and ignore the findings.
 

Fubard

Well-Known Member
Just ask Dr Nutt, if they don;t like what the specialists say, they just fire them and ignore the findings.
Different regime now, they've not had a choice but make a u-turn on policy thanks to changes in public opinion, and with the move towards legal mmj and rec in various countries snowballing then it is a matter of time.

People just have to be patient, this may be a small step taken in the UK, but the reality is that it is an important one as the reclassification of cannabis as a class 2 medicine, a move that means they have admitted they have lied for generations, is bigger than people realise as it changes everything regarding how marijuana is treated since even if they say mmj is only classed as specific pharma products you can guarantee there will be one simple lawsuit which will open the door to all forms of weed being classified as mmj.

From that point, the legal side collapses as so many people will have letters from their doc for things like bad backs it will be impossible to control.

That's how the UK works, poorly defined legislation with loopholes you could sail a supertanker through. They'll expand the current mmj from Sativex to include other pharma products, and someone will file a "Human Rights" suit saying that his right to life or something is being hindered due to the restrictions in place and then it's game over.

Attitudes have changed as research and knowledge has increased, and public opinion is the only thing governments are interested in. Add in the absolute shitstorm they're currently in over things like Brexit and spending cuts, and you also see they desperately need some "good news" to turn things round a bit. That, alone, is one hell of an influence.

People need to be patient, things are moving faster than they realise.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Different regime now, they've not had a choice but make a u-turn on policy thanks to changes in public opinion, and with the move towards legal mmj and rec in various countries snowballing then it is a matter of time.

People just have to be patient, this may be a small step taken in the UK, but the reality is that it is an important one as the reclassification of cannabis as a class 2 medicine, a move that means they have admitted they have lied for generations, is bigger than people realise as it changes everything regarding how marijuana is treated since even if they say mmj is only classed as specific pharma products you can guarantee there will be one simple lawsuit which will open the door to all forms of weed being classified as mmj.

From that point, the legal side collapses as so many people will have letters from their doc for things like bad backs it will be impossible to control.

That's how the UK works, poorly defined legislation with loopholes you could sail a supertanker through. They'll expand the current mmj from Sativex to include other pharma products, and someone will file a "Human Rights" suit saying that his right to life or something is being hindered due to the restrictions in place and then it's game over.

Attitudes have changed as research and knowledge has increased, and public opinion is the only thing governments are interested in. Add in the absolute shitstorm they're currently in over things like Brexit and spending cuts, and you also see they desperately need some "good news" to turn things round a bit. That, alone, is one hell of an influence.

People need to be patient, things are moving faster than they realise.
Whatever works, mate.

As screwball as it sounds, at least it's responsive to public opinion eventually.
 

Fubard

Well-Known Member
Whatever works, mate.

As screwball as it sounds, at least it's responsive to public opinion eventually.
As I've said elsewhere, the biggest issue for NATIONAL governments, which is a reason its so easy for US States to enact legislation as the main issue lies at Federal level, is that they have to admit that everything they have said about Marijuana over the last near 100 years has been a lie, that these people don't know best, and that they did not only get it wrong but also forced people to suffer because they could not get something that has been used as a traditional medicine for millenia. There's decades of brainwashing to undo, and like with the Brits and binge drinking, that culture of misinformation and lies cannot be changed overnight.

The important thing is that there is progress. They are half way to admitting they got it wrong by citing "overwhelming scientific evidence", the evidence some of us have known and experienced for decades, now they just have to sell it properly and the fuckup of legal system will do the rest.
 
Top