Olive Drab Green
Well-Known Member
You literally did the math.sorry i wont concede this. you're literally the only person in the thread that believes that.
You literally did the math.sorry i wont concede this. you're literally the only person in the thread that believes that.
"if" if does, yes of course you can. give or take depending on efficiency you need about 100 cob watts to apply 900 ppfd to a 18x18 area, and consequently ~300W of cobs to apply 900 ppfd to a 54"' x 18" area
And it does specify 5 square feet/0.465sq.m @18”. I had initially missed it.going back to the timber link you posted, with all due respect to dan/timber, listing "1013 ppfd" as a spec of the light is completely meaningless. assuming the 466 umol/s PPF figure is indeed accurate, to apply 1013 ppfd to an area you need to control that area to a size of 466/1013 = 0.46 sq. meter = 4.95 sq ft = 27" x 27"
PPFD vs PPF can indeed be confusing
Read the post above yours.^^^^this
I have both.That's for the 2 cob fixture. I thought you had 3x single cob fixtures?
math = factualYou literally did the math.
I’m not saying my original post is accurate, just that my PPFD is correct. I was off a factor with my original post. But electroluminescence does explain the efficiency difference, even if it isn’t as much as I originally had said.math = factual
your conclusion that the math i presented supports the premise of your original post= false logic
i dont have time to go round and round with someone who cannot admit they were wrong, sorry.