USA move closer to equality in wages

What will increasing the minimum accompish?

  • Make a lot of workers very happy, and boost the economy

  • Cost jobs and drive businesses into bankruptcy

  • Nothing

Results are only viewable after voting.
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
Why don't you vote for Hillary dumb dumb?
Click to expand...
Because she isn't the best person for the job, genius. Since you are definitely not a multi millionaire, the better question is why would YOU?

And still can't answer an economics question or defend a talking point to save your miserable existence.

Whack a mole.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
If that where true he would use the sun...
Click to expand...
Under the sun is going to be a very crowded place soon. With the legalization of hemp, outdoor product intended for smoking will become 'con semilla', pretty much no matter where it's grown- except indoors behind filters. Where environmental control can be perfect. Where soil quality and nutrition can be perfect. Where lighting can be perfect.

So top grades of this commodity known as cannabis will still be grown indoors.

Whack a mole.
 
bluntmassa1

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Because she isn't the best person for the job, genius. Since you are definitely not a multi millionaire, the better question is why would YOU?

And still can't answer an economics question or defend a talking point to save your miserable existence.

Whack a mole.
Click to expand...
I think I'm voting for Johnson I won't vote for Hillary that leads us into more war and more Russian propaganda same as Obomber.
 
bluntmassa1

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Under the sun is going to be a very crowded place soon. With the legalization of hemp, outdoor product intended for smoking will become 'con semilla', pretty much no matter where it's grown- except indoors behind filters. Where environmental control can be perfect. Where soil quality and nutrition can be perfect. Where lighting can be perfect.

So top grades of this commodity known as cannabis will still be grown indoors.

Whack a mole.
Click to expand...
Or equatorial in greenhouse's enjoy paying your help $15 an hour smart guy. :)
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
bluntmassa1 said:
Not as much as in a 3rd world country and paying well is $10 a day. :)
Click to expand...
First, how would you know? You haven't bothered to cite sources for any of the rest of your bullshit.

Whack a mole.

Second, why do you think that impoverishing vast numbers of Americans helps our economy? And where is your proof?

Whack a mole.

Why would a third world country be competition?

Whack a mole.
 
Last edited:
S

spandy

Well-Known Member
see4 said:
Do you think those who make $2,000,000 a year should pay 20% of their income while people who make $50,000 should also pay 20% of their income?

Executives (those with shit tons of money), hide behind corporate wealth. I don't think anyone here is talking about or complaining about small business owners who happen to make a lot of money. I think everyone would agree, "good for them!".

Do you think it's ok that the CEO of Yahoo should make $365,000,000 over 5 years?

Do you think it's ok for Mitt Romney to pay as little as 11% income taxes? Or perhaps The Donald? He likely pays the same amount in income taxes. But we don't know that for sure because he has yet to release his taxes, the thing he said he would do, but didn't. Like everything else he says.
Click to expand...
So people who are successful should have their money nipple sucked on harder just because they are better at it? Fuck that.

You make a dollar, you get taxed on that dollar. Rates should be the same across the boards. After all is said and done, I support helping those below certain margins, but propping someone up for life is also bullshit if they are mentally and physically capable.

And close all the loopholes that these rich fuckers take advantage of. They need to pay their fair share like everyone else, but we dont need to prop ourselves up by gouging them for being successful.
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
....who would of thought that Communism could be so profitable.

China National Chemical Corporation wants to buy Syngenta AG, a Swiss agriculture company with substantial holdings in the U.S. Syngenta sells more pesticides than any company in North America, and is among the biggest sellers of genetically modified seeds. So this $43 billion deal would put a significant portion of U.S. food infrastructure in Chinese hands.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/03/senators-try-to-scuttle-syngentachemchina-merger-in-a-harbinger-for-u-s-posture-toward-chinese-investment.html

Meanwhile back on the mid-way.....cuz we be skipping school...
 
Last edited:
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
So people who are successful should have their money nipple sucked on harder just because they are better at it? Fuck that.

You make a dollar, you get taxed on that dollar. Rates should be the same across the boards. After all is said and done, I support helping those below certain margins, but propping someone up for life is also bullshit if they are mentally and physically capable.

And close all the loopholes that these rich fuckers take advantage of. They need to pay their fair share like everyone else, but we dont need to prop ourselves up by gouging them for being successful.
Click to expand...
Lol first you apologize for the rich, then say everyone should be taxes the same then say no more loopholes.

Your economic plans work better in a Swiss cheesemaking facility than anywhere else.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
....who would of thought that Communism could be so profitable.

China National Chemical Corporation wants to buy Syngenta AG, a Swiss agriculture company with substantial holdings in the U.S. Syngenta sells more pesticides than any company in North America, and is among the biggest sellers of genetically modified seeds. So this $43 billion deal would put a significant portion of U.S. food infrastructure in Chinese hands.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/03/senators-try-to-scuttle-syngentachemchina-merger-in-a-harbinger-for-u-s-posture-toward-chinese-investment.html

Meanwhile back on the mid-way.....cuz we be skipping school...
Click to expand...
It sent me to the main page, but wow what a treasure trove!
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
spandy said:
So people who are successful should have their money nipple sucked on harder just because they are better at it? Fuck that.

You make a dollar, you get taxed on that dollar. Rates should be the same across the boards. After all is said and done, I support helping those below certain margins, but propping someone up for life is also bullshit if they are mentally and physically capable.

And close all the loopholes that these rich fuckers take advantage of. They need to pay their fair share like everyone else, but we dont need to prop ourselves up by gouging them for being successful.
Click to expand...
Just how much US profits (Loopholes) should go towards a Communist build up? or is it just based on how successful they are?
 
bluntmassa1

bluntmassa1

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
First, how would you know? You haven't bothered to cite sources for any of the rest of your bullshit.

Whack a mole.

Second, why do you think that impoverishing vast numbers of Americans helps our economy? And where is your proof?

Whack a mole.

Why would a third world country be competition?

Whack a mole.
Click to expand...
It's well known them sweat shops only pay $8 a day.... Now farming for $10 they would love me. :)
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Rrog said:
Unfortunately, this is what has to be done. "Free market" benefits the 1%. Given a choice, people in control will exploit those they control. This is a hard-wired part of humanity, unfortunately. We need to join the rest of the world to start re-balancing the ledger
Click to expand...

Your point about people in control exploiting those they control, is a good one and very ironic, given the rest of your post.

You've apparently confused the crony market which exists today with a free market, which has been disallowed....by the controllers. I recommend you align your platitudes with reality for a better effect.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
That's drivel, not an answer- and you didn't even address the other questions.
Click to expand...

About how much force are you comfortable with applying to two people, who have made a consensual agreement between them, which doesn't include you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top