ClosetGarden
Active Member
It’s been well established cannabis plants produce more THC in response to UV light as a protective agent. My question is, does this mean CBD levels are lowered due to the plant’s focus on THC production?
The resin production is increased to protect the flower from UV damage. The amount of THC or CBD would be determined by the amount of THCA synthase and CBDA synthase coded for in the plants DNA- , not the UV light. If you had a high CBD hemp plant you were growing for flower under increased amounts of UV it would display increased resin which, presumably, would be higher in CBD, or really CBDA. That plant would still have low THC but it might be higher than it would have if it weren't exposed to the increased UV. I think the high THC plant would be similar. It would probably have a slight increase in both cannabinoids.It’s been well established cannabis plants produce more THC in response to UV light as a protective agent. My question is, does this mean CBD levels are lowered due to the plant’s focus on THC production?
that study is from 1986, i wish i could see what the same research department is working on today.
my thinking is , the end result, would be yes.Uv doesn't increase thc, just makes trichs pop.
Its UVA that increase thrich coverage. UVB to make them more potent.Uv doesn't increase thc, just makes trichs pop.
All UV light is used in photosynthesis. UV light is never wasted. just dont use too much.Its UVA that increase thrich coverage. UVB to make them more potent.
Right. But different nanometers of light have different effects on photosynthesis.All UV light is used in photosynthesis. UV light is never wasted. just dont use too much.
Right. But different nanometers of light have different effects on photosynthesis.
And yes, CMH is liked for its UVA production.
Gotcha. Yea, a bit tighter mode spacing, I notice more trichomes in veg now. Even a week from seed. I'm sure it makes the plants hungry for more nutrients?Yes.
The point I was making is, until recently UV was not recognised as a type of PAR. Only recently has science "admitted" that UV radiation is indeed PAR radiation (The plant uses it to GROW). UV is not simply additional light to achieve a bit more trichomes, it counts as PAR.
Definitely. The plants aren't really hungry. That's a human word. Of you give them more energy, they can do more with the nutrients, so faster growth etc. Uv is a very high energy light, so it actually penetrates the leaves and stems and buds.Gotcha. Yea, a bit tighter mode spacing, I notice more trichomes in veg now. Even a week from seed. I'm sure it makes the plants hungry for more nutrients?