PJ Diaz
Well-Known Member
It's an opinion piece, not peer reviewed.argumentum ad verecundiam
It's an opinion piece, not peer reviewed.argumentum ad verecundiam
I do recognize that value is subjective, so the biggest obligation we have towards others is to leave them alone if they are peaceful and not trying to run our lives.I do recognize that individuals do have certain obligations to Society in general. I am no anarchist.
Rather like the declaration it dismantles. You keep getting caught carrying fascist water.It's an opinion piece, not peer reviewed.
There is nothing fascist about the Great Barrington Declaration whatsoever.Rather like the declaration it dismantles. You keep getting caught carrying fascist water.
False. It has backing from a major libertarian think tank and was endorsed by agent orange himself. Two solid counts of pro-fascism.There is nothing fascist about the Great Barrington Declaration whatsoever.
Since you fired the shot, do disclose the peer-reviewed source for that.
"Focused Protection" does not work e.g. Sweden had worse outcomes than neighboring countries. Great Barrington Declaration amounted to letting the virus rip through the world - disabling and killing "the weak", in contradiction to what the overwhelming majority of experts advised, an idiotic disregard for scientific expertise and the value of human life as seen in fascism.There is nothing fascist about the Great Barrington Declaration whatsoever.
Libertarian horseshit...well that's a funny name for a person.Would it surprise you that that man endorsed it?
Oddly enough, nearly 3/4 of doctors surveyed disagree with your assessment, as noted in the article linked below."Focused Protection" does not work e.g. Sweden had worse outcomes than neighboring countries. Great Barrington Declaration amounted to letting the virus rip through the world - disabling and killing "the weak", in contradiction to what the overwhelming majority of experts advised, an idiotic disregard for scientific expertise and the value of human life as seen in fascism.
Since you fired the shot, do disclose the peer-reviewed source for that.
I’ll see your picked cherry and raise you an actual peer-reviewed article.Oddly enough, nearly 3/4 of doctors surveyed disagree with your assessment, as noted in the article linked below.
Scientists are more in favor of Covid 19 protection than restrictions - PMC
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Weak sauce.False. It has backing from a major libertarian think tank and was endorsed by agent orange himself. Two solid counts of pro-fascism.
Your reveling in fallacy does not impugn my statement.Weak sauce.
Hitler took a daily morning shit and I take a morning shit.
OMG!!! I'm fucking Hitler !!!
No ShitHitler took a daily morning shit and I take a morning shit.
OMG!!! I'm fucking Hitler !!!
CDC V-Safe covid vaccine injury data incoming. Sad that it took 2 lawsuits.
Is this one of those troll tactics where we are supposed to pretend that your highlighted part means that those were vaccine related events like good cucks?CDC's Covid-19 Vaccine v-safe Data Released Pursuant to Court Order
/PRNewswire/ -- In response to a lawsuit filed by Siri & Glimstad LLP on behalf of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), the CDC has released the first...www.prnewswire.com
View attachment 5208090
PR Newswire - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by appealing to emotion ormediabiasfactcheck.com
View attachment 5208091
There were also 71 million symptoms reported in the pre-populated fields. This is an average of more than 7 symptoms reported per v-safe user. Reported symptoms include, for example, over 4 million reports of joint pain. While around 2 million of these joint pain reports were mild, over 1.8 million were for moderate joint pain and over 400,000 were for severe joint pain. It is noted that v-safe includes data from less than 4 percent of individuals who received a Covid-19 vaccine in the United States.