Verbal Diarrhea live

londonfog said:

so why were charges not levied on PP, because what you say is not true.

The full video shows that after Nucatola mentions the $30 to $100, she describes how those amounts would be reimbursement for expenses related to handling and transportation of the tissues.

full read here: http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

That's like me saying I would give you a Playstation 4 but you have to pay for the shipping, which is 30. Now a PlayStation 4 is worth 350 dollars, but you only paid 30 for the shipping. I just gave you a PS4, you paid for shipping.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

Except the shipping was $20 and you pocked $10.00 for 'handling'. It is semantics. PP has a revenue stream from selling baby parts.

Click to expand...

londonfog said:

no the shipping was 30 and I pocket nothing.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

. PP has a revenue stream from selling baby parts.

Click to expand...

Padawanbater2 said:

...and that's what resonates with the retard base who believe PP sells baby parts for profit

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

PP does sell baby parts for money. That really isnt in dispute.

Click to expand...

NLXSK1 said:

The companies buying baby parts advertise it as an additional revenue stream from the clinics.

I understand if you do not want to accept the facts of this case.

What you want to say is that Planned Parenthood is donating baby parts for a profit but that does not mean they are selling them.

Click to expand...