ANC
Well-Known Member
I know we are creatures of habit, and once we found something that works OK we tend to be very slow to adopt new ideas.
For me that habit has been the, shall we call them constant voltage drivers, i.e. 48A vs C1050 or C1400 etc.
I've been simply paralleling them and the large number of diodes per connected board seem to balance them out OK.
I do notice many people batting for the other team and using the constant current only drivers..
My main objections are, Running voltages above 48VDC, I also don't like the potentiometer on a wire thing. It requires an expensive box and seal system to retain IP rating. It would probably be easier (cheaper) to rig a 1p3t switch with hardwired resistors for 3 settings with a sealed toggle switch in a little IP67 box. But it still is an unnecessary piece of hardware hanging on my stuff.
My lights are simple designs with 3 or 4 Samsung strips on a 48A driver of whatever Wattage...
Where do you stand on this?
For me that habit has been the, shall we call them constant voltage drivers, i.e. 48A vs C1050 or C1400 etc.
I've been simply paralleling them and the large number of diodes per connected board seem to balance them out OK.
I do notice many people batting for the other team and using the constant current only drivers..
My main objections are, Running voltages above 48VDC, I also don't like the potentiometer on a wire thing. It requires an expensive box and seal system to retain IP rating. It would probably be easier (cheaper) to rig a 1p3t switch with hardwired resistors for 3 settings with a sealed toggle switch in a little IP67 box. But it still is an unnecessary piece of hardware hanging on my stuff.
My lights are simple designs with 3 or 4 Samsung strips on a 48A driver of whatever Wattage...
Where do you stand on this?