What do Progressives Contribute to Our Country

beenthere said:

One could say the same thing about progressives who are strict 1st amendment constitutionalists.
Most only respect the parts of the 1st amendment that suits them.

Click to expand...

Respectfully, but support for censorship of speech is not something anybody wants. The right to strongly disagree might come off as that, but I am not seeing the same weight on both sides. I am just saying that it is not a lib/cons issue. Speech and flexibility are signs of intellect and character. Stubborn cherrypickers are certainly found in liberal people but I can't seem to get an inch out of people here. You know, I get branded as a liberal because I believe in social programs but what is missing is a counterpoint to my arguments. Mostly I am a freeloading lib-tard but am left with no alternative solutions to issues by the right. My solutions may be awful but nonetheless I made them. The more I speak with everybody, the more respect I have for compromise...Is that partisan?

There is no historical precedent for the number of cabinet-level nominees that Republicans have blocked or delayed in the Obama administration. Chuck Hagel became the first defense secretary nominee ever filibustered. John Brennan, the C.I.A. director, was the subject of an epic filibuster by Senator Rand Paul. Kathleen Sebelius and John Bryson, the secretaries of health and human services and commerce, were subjected to 60-vote confirmation margins instead of simple majorities. Susan Rice surely would have been filibustered and thus was not nominated to be secretary of state.
Jacob Lew, the Treasury secretary, was barraged with 444 written questions, mostly from Republicans, more than the previous seven nominees for that position combined. Many were ridiculous and had nothing to do with Mr. Lew’s fitness for office, such as a demand to explain the Treasury’s social media policies, or questioning an infographic on the department’s blog eight months ago.
Gina McCarthy, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, is being blocked by Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri until he gets the answers he wants on a local levee project. And Thomas Perez, nominated to be labor secretary, is being held up by Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, who is angry about the Justice Department’s enforcement of voting rights laws. By comparison, there were four filibusters of cabinet-level positions during George W. Bush’s two terms, and one under President Ronald Reagan.
There have also been several impediments to executive-branch nominees beneath the cabinet level, the most troubling being that of Richard Cordray, whom Mr. Obama has renominated to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because the bureau cannot properly run without a full-time director, Republicans intend to nullify many of its powers by blocking Mr. Cordray for the second time.




Right, because Republicans aren't obstructionists.