Frank Nitty
Well-Known Member
What is more important, wattage, lumens or k,or are those the same thing
All are as important as each other.What is more important, wattage, lumens or k,or are those the same thing
Thank you sir for your information,I shall strive to use this to my fullest capabilityAll are as important as each other.
Wattage= power
Lumens= light output
K= colour spectrum
Yeah,at the time I thought it was a good question...no n I see that it was the newb in me... that would burn down everything!!! especially in a sterilite tub!!! I know better now!!! I have a tent anyways now,so I could do that,but I won't...300w...? CFL...?
As all of the posts said, they are all metrics that describe specific physical characteristics of a light source. Based on what I've been able to glean in the net(which, unfortunately, may be all bs) knowing how much energy (PPF) it emits in micromoles per second(umole/s) allows you to know if it has enough 'oomph' to adequately illuminate your space. Lumens are similar but the measurement is biased towards how we see rather than what type of light that plants thrive on. Getting the most 'oomph' from each watt of power I pay for is definitely a goal. That's called photon efficacy and is measured in umole/J. That metric gives you the most info on how well an emitter converts electricity to light. The spectrum(k) seems to have more impact on quality of the flower and physical structure- on my system, I blend 3k and 4k emitters and then add some 660nm during flower-they seem to love it.What is more important, wattage, lumens or k,or are those the same thing