FuZZyBUDz
Well-Known Member
i havent read most of the post here, but i made a thread that might be useful right here?
deteriming witch method of hydro best suits YOU
deteriming witch method of hydro best suits YOU
I agree, yet have to somewhat disagree if that makes any sense. They are definitely capable of achieving the best possible results, but are very inefficient overall. Why you ask? Well for one it's almost certain you'll need to run a chiller with it($$) and two, UC systems require a LOT of light for optimal performance($$$), which in turn leads to a significant amount of ventilation and quite possibly the need for a dedicated ac unit for the grow(again $$$).If you want to know what "THE BEST" hydro system is the right now I would say Under Current systems. They are extremely versatile and can support larger plants than any other hydro system I have seen. You use a lot less nutrients because of the oxgen enriched water and plants grow crazy fast.
I agree, yet have to somewhat disagree if that makes any sense. They are definitely capable of achieving the best possible results, but are very inefficient overall. Why you ask? Well for one it's almost certain you'll need to run a chiller with it($$) and two, UC systems require a LOT of light for optimal performance($$$), which in turn leads to a significant amount of ventilation and quite possibly the need for a dedicated ac unit for the grow(again $$$).
Honestly I think the UC would be more suitable in a greenhouse application. The chiller may still be necessary, but the power bill would be greatly reduced.
Am i the only one seeing the huge ass snake?
I believe you're referring to the UCPRO system, which is making me drool all over myself just thinking about it (fast fwd to 10 seconds)...The commercial UC systems from Current Culture and the others are spaced too far apart in my opinion.