what percentage of obamacare do you support?

on a scale from 0% to 100%, how much of the PPACA are you in favor of?


  • Total voters
    42

colonuggs

Well-Known Member
Be specific

What about Obamacare increased your sons insurance premium at work?
Before the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, President Obama promised Americans they could keep their healthcare plan if they liked it. But already hundreds of thousands of citizens are receiving notification that their plans are being cancelled because they don't comply with the new law, and, according to NBC News, the Obama administration has known for at least three years the cancellations were coming.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Before the Affordable Care Act became law in 2010, President Obama promised Americans they could keep their healthcare plan if they liked it. But already hundreds of thousands of citizens are receiving notification that their plans are being cancelled because they don't comply with the new law, and, according to NBC News, the Obama administration has known for at least three years the cancellations were coming.
your copy and paste did not even come close to addressing the question you were asked.

100% fail.
 

colonuggs

Well-Known Member
your copy and paste did not even come close to addressing the question you were asked.

100% fail.
what part about their existing plans are being cancelled because they don't comply....I will have ask my sons boss for exact details
 

colonuggs

Well-Known Member
yeah, go get some details.

non sequitir copy and pastes are not doing the trick.
While we are waiting for details about my son. I can tell you first hand that I had Molina Health Insurance through the state of Washington paid on a sliding fee scale cost us $120 a month for basic health insurance....now were looking at paying a lot more and get a lot less because of Obama...Our Coverage ends on January 1... tell me what 2 adults one with heart problems the other with lupus and a failing kidney will pay for basic coverage...not $120 a month
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buck...

Do you see your poll numbers?.. It looks like not many people are thinking like you...It looks like 0% is winning...what does that tell you?
it tells me that there is a lot of butthurt in here, since there are so many very popular provisions of the PPACA.

but i guess you support kicking cancer kids off their insurance if they get too expensive, and telling people that they can't get insurance because they once had a cough when they were 13.
 

echelon1k1

New Member
it tells me that there is a lot of butthurt in here, since there are so many very popular provisions of the PPACA.

but i guess you support kicking cancer kids off their insurance if they get too expensive, and telling people that they can't get insurance because they once had a cough when they were 13.
this thread is testament to your ongoing butthurt... Bro 0% won by a LANDSLIDE...:dunce:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
this thread is testament to your ongoing butthurt... Bro 0% won by a LANDSLIDE...:dunce:
do you think that upsets me?

now i get to use state that those people who said 0% want cancer children to die if they get too expensive.

edit: even desertdude and muyloco said 10%. they know how this game is played more than the empty headed, reactionary buffoons who said 0%
 

echelon1k1

New Member
do you think that upsets me?

now i get to use state that those people who said 0% want cancer children to die if they get too expensive.
Children with cancer will always die - it's a fact that treatment is more profitable than cure... And to think all those health insurance execs meeting with Obama at the WH had one thing on their minds;

"How can we make it cheaper for the cancer children?"

Your ignorance cracks me up go lecture someone on racial resentment moron....
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Children with cancer will always die - it's a fact that treatment is more profitable than cure... And to think all those health insurance execs meeting with Obama at the WH had one thing on their minds;

"How can we make it cheaper for the cancer children?"

Your ignorance cracks me up go lecture someone on racial resentment moron....
bla bla bla butthurt bla bla
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
do you think that upsets me?

now i get to use state that those people who said 0% want cancer children to die if they get too expensive.

edit: even desertdude and muyloco said 10%. they know how this game is played more than the empty headed, reactionary buffoons who said 0%
sounds like you want cancer children to die... Do you require a citation?
I don't understand Buck's logic. Obamcare is such a cluster fuck, I voted 0%, meaning: start over! 10% still means reading over 2,000 pages. Screw that.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
do you think that upsets me?

now i get to use state that those people who said 0% want cancer children to die if they get too expensive.

edit: even desertdude and muyloco said 10%. they know how this game is played more than the empty headed, reactionary buffoons who said 0%
If you only support the preexisting condition clause, thats one line out of like 20 million. you would select 0% because its much closer to 0% of the ACA than it is 10%.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
10% still means reading over 2,000 pages. Screw that.
is it all the wya up to 74 million pages now? wow.

If you only support the preexisting condition clause, thats one line out of like 20 million. you would select 0% because its much closer to 0% of the ACA than it is 10%.
20 million, eh?

what about all the other provisions that are wildly popular with americans, like the provisions on lifetime caps, expansions on mental health parity, and the like?

most of the PPACA is just already existing law anyway, not many of those 183 million pages are actually new.




edit: in the time it took me to type that, the PPACA grew to 197 million pages and change.
 

colonuggs

Well-Known Member
do you think that upsets me?

now i get to use state that those people who said 0% want cancer children to die if they get too expensive.

edit: even desertdude and muyloco said 10%. they know how this game is played more than the empty headed, reactionary buffoons who said 0%
Some of us who said 0 would like to see marijuana advanced enough to help everyone with cancer:weed: And cheaply done... Fuck the gov...there needs to be some serious reform in this country in a lot of areas
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
it tells me that there is a lot of butthurt in here, since there are so many very popular provisions of the PPACA.

but i guess you support kicking cancer kids off their insurance if they get too expensive, and telling people that they can't get insurance because they once had a cough when they were 13.
Buck..

Do I have to remind you that the law passed...All the suckers have to do is sign up ...Did you forget about that?
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Buck..

Do I have to remind you that that the law passed...All the suckers have to do is sign up ...Did you forget about that?
They've got 3 in Alaska already, huge success.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...idy-calculator


[h=5][/h] Enroll Alaska has been able to enroll a grand total of only three people since the launch of the health-insurance marketplaces on October 1. It has now given up entirely on that goal, at least until Healthcare.gov, the federal health-care exchange, gives Alaskans accurate figures on the subsidies they’re eligible for.





[h=5][/h]
 

nitro harley

Well-Known Member
They've got 3 in Alaska already, huge success.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...idy-calculator


Enroll Alaska has been able to enroll a grand total of only three people since the launch of the health-insurance marketplaces on October 1. It has now given up entirely on that goal, at least until Healthcare.gov, the federal health-care exchange, gives Alaskans accurate figures on the subsidies they’re eligible for.
I am not surprised.....If you look at Bucks poll at the top of the page. You will see about the same kinda numbers...
 
Top